These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26314241)

  • 1. Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake.
    Trijsburg L; de Vries JH; Boshuizen HC; Hulshof PJ; Hollman PC; van 't Veer P; Geelen A
    Br J Nutr; 2015 Oct; 114(8):1304-12. PubMed ID: 26314241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of approaches to correct intake–health associations for FFQ measurement error using a duplicate recovery biomarker and a duplicate 24 h dietary recall as reference method.
    Geelen A; Souverein OW; Busstra MC; de Vries JH; van't Veer P
    Public Health Nutr; 2015 Feb; 18(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 24499731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validating fatty acid intake as estimated by an FFQ: how does the 24 h recall perform as reference method compared with the duplicate portion?
    Trijsburg L; de Vries JH; Hollman PC; Hulshof PJ; van 't Veer P; Boshuizen HC; Geelen A
    Public Health Nutr; 2018 Oct; 21(14):2568-2574. PubMed ID: 29734960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BMI was found to be a consistent determinant related to misreporting of energy, protein and potassium intake using self-report and duplicate portion methods.
    Trijsburg L; Geelen A; Hollman PC; Hulshof PJ; Feskens EJ; Van't Veer P; Boshuizen HC; de Vries JH
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Mar; 20(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 27724995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of dietary taste patterns as assessed by FFQ against 24-h recalls and biomarkers of exposure.
    van Langeveld AWB; Teo PS; Mars M; Feskens EJM; de Graaf C; de Vries JHM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2019 Jan; 73(1):132-140. PubMed ID: 30254242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OPEN about obesity: recovery biomarkers, dietary reporting errors and BMI.
    Lissner L; Troiano RP; Midthune D; Heitmann BL; Kipnis V; Subar AF; Potischman N
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2007 Jun; 31(6):956-61. PubMed ID: 17299385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A national FFQ for the Netherlands (the FFQ-NL 1.0): validation of a comprehensive FFQ for adults.
    Sluik D; Geelen A; de Vries JH; Eussen SJ; Brants HA; Meijboom S; van Dongen MC; Bueno-de-Mesquita HB; Wijckmans-Duysens NE; van 't Veer P; Dagnelie PC; Ocké MC; Feskens EJ
    Br J Nutr; 2016 Sep; 116(5):913-23. PubMed ID: 27452894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study.
    Schatzkin A; Kipnis V; Carroll RJ; Midthune D; Subar AF; Bingham S; Schoeller DA; Troiano RP; Freedman LS
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Dec; 32(6):1054-62. PubMed ID: 14681273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using enhanced regression calibration to combine dietary intake estimates from 24 h recall and FFQ reduces bias in diet-disease associations.
    Looman M; Boshuizen HC; Feskens EJ; Geelen A
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Oct; 22(15):2738-2746. PubMed ID: 31262375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Checking for completeness of 24-h urine collection using para-amino benzoic acid not necessary in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition study.
    Subar AF; Midthune D; Tasevska N; Kipnis V; Freedman LS
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2013 Aug; 67(8):863-7. PubMed ID: 23486508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of Absolute Intake and Nutrient Density of Protein, Potassium, and Sodium Assessed by Various Dietary Assessment Methods: An Exploratory Study.
    Trijsburg L; Geelen A; Hulshof PJM; Van't Veer P; Boshuizen HC; Hollman PCH; van Dijk G; Feskens EJM; de Vries JHM
    Nutrients; 2019 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of the assessment of folate and vitamin B12 intake in women of reproductive age: the method of triads.
    Verkleij-Hagoort AC; de Vries JH; Stegers MP; Lindemans J; Ursem NT; Steegers-Theunissen RP
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2007 May; 61(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 17164826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of biological markers to validate self-reported dietary intake in a random sample of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer United Kingdom Norfolk cohort.
    McKeown NM; Day NE; Welch AA; Runswick SA; Luben RN; Mulligan AA; McTaggart A; Bingham SA
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2001 Aug; 74(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 11470719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a Web-based, self-administered, non-consecutive-day dietary record tool against urinary biomarkers.
    Lassale C; Castetbon K; Laporte F; Camilleri GM; Deschamps V; Vernay M; Faure P; Hercberg S; Galan P; Kesse-Guyot E
    Br J Nutr; 2015 Mar; 113(6):953-62. PubMed ID: 25772032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and reliability of a new food frequency questionnaire compared to 24 h recalls and biochemical measurements: pilot phase of Golestan cohort study of esophageal cancer.
    Malekshah AF; Kimiagar M; Saadatian-Elahi M; Pourshams A; Nouraie M; Goglani G; Hoshiarrad A; Sadatsafavi M; Golestan B; Yoonesi A; Rakhshani N; Fahimi S; Nasrollahzadeh D; Salahi R; Ghafarpour A; Semnani S; Steghens JP; Abnet CC; Kamangar F; Dawsey SM; Brennan P; Boffetta P; Malekzadeh R
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2006 Aug; 60(8):971-7. PubMed ID: 16465196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity Coefficient of Repeated Measurements of Urinary Marker of Sugar Intake Is Comparable to Urinary Nitrogen as Marker of Protein Intake in Free-living Subjects.
    Abreu TC; Hulshof PJM; Boshuizen HC; Trijsburg L; Gray N; de Vries JHM
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2021 Jan; 30(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 32998945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The validity of a web-based FFQ assessed by doubly labelled water and multiple 24-h recalls.
    Medin AC; Carlsen MH; Hambly C; Speakman JR; Strohmaier S; Andersen LF
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Dec; 118(12):1106-1117. PubMed ID: 29202890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study.
    Kipnis V; Subar AF; Midthune D; Freedman LS; Ballard-Barbash R; Troiano RP; Bingham S; Schoeller DA; Schatzkin A; Carroll RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 158(1):14-21; discussion 22-6. PubMed ID: 12835281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validating an FFQ for intake of episodically consumed foods: application to the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study.
    Midthune D; Schatzkin A; Subar AF; Thompson FE; Freedman LS; Carroll RJ; Shumakovich MA; Kipnis V
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Jul; 14(7):1212-21. PubMed ID: 21486523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epidemiological assessment of diet: a comparison of a 7-day diary with a food frequency questionnaire using urinary markers of nitrogen, potassium and sodium.
    Day N; McKeown N; Wong M; Welch A; Bingham S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 30(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 11369735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.