BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26314386)

  • 1. Detection of selective sweeps in structured populations: a comparison of recent methods.
    Vatsiou AI; Bazin E; Gaggiotti OE
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 26314386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On detecting incomplete soft or hard selective sweeps using haplotype structure.
    Ferrer-Admetlla A; Liang M; Korneliussen T; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 May; 31(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 24554778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Haplotype-based analysis of selective sweeps in sheep.
    Kijas JW
    Genome; 2014 Aug; 57(8):433-7. PubMed ID: 25372788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting signatures of selection through haplotype differentiation among hierarchically structured populations.
    Fariello MI; Boitard S; Naya H; SanCristobal M; Servin B
    Genetics; 2013 Mar; 193(3):929-41. PubMed ID: 23307896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Composite-Likelihood Method for Detecting Incomplete Selective Sweep from Population Genomic Data.
    Vy HM; Kim Y
    Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):633-49. PubMed ID: 25911658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection and Classification of Hard and Soft Sweeps from Unphased Genotypes by Multilocus Genotype Identity.
    Harris AM; Garud NR; DeGiorgio M
    Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1429-1452. PubMed ID: 30315068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A haplotype method detects diverse scenarios of local adaptation from genomic sequence variation.
    Lange JD; Pool JE
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3081-100. PubMed ID: 27135633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A whole genome long-range haplotype (WGLRH) test for detecting imprints of positive selection in human populations.
    Zhang C; Bailey DK; Awad T; Liu G; Xing G; Cao M; Valmeekam V; Retief J; Matsuzaki H; Taub M; Seielstad M; Kennedy GC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(17):2122-8. PubMed ID: 16845142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.
    Schrider DR; Mendes FK; Hahn MW; Kern AD
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 25716978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genome Scan for Selection in Structured Layer Chicken Populations Exploiting Linkage Disequilibrium Information.
    Gholami M; Reimer C; Erbe M; Preisinger R; Weigend A; Weigend S; Servin B; Simianer H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130497. PubMed ID: 26151449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Signatures of soft sweeps across the Dt1 locus underlying determinate growth habit in soya bean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.].
    Zhong L; Yang Q; Yan X; Yu C; Su L; Zhang X; Zhu Y
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Sep; 26(18):4686-4699. PubMed ID: 28627128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genome scan methods against more complex models: when and how much should we trust them?
    de Villemereuil P; Frichot É; Bazin É; François O; Gaggiotti OE
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Apr; 23(8):2006-19. PubMed ID: 24611968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new approach for using genome scans to detect recent positive selection in the human genome.
    Tang K; Thornton KR; Stoneking M
    PLoS Biol; 2007 Jul; 5(7):e171. PubMed ID: 17579516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1009373. PubMed ID: 33635910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recent selective sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster show signatures of soft sweeps.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Buzbas EO; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1005004. PubMed ID: 25706129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-wide candidate regions for selective sweeps revealed through massive parallel sequencing of DNA across ten turkey populations.
    Aslam ML; Bastiaansen JW; Megens HJ; Crooijmans RP; Nasreen F; Blomberg le A; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Schroeder SG; Groenen MA; Long JA
    BMC Genet; 2014 Nov; 15():117. PubMed ID: 25421611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The pitfalls and virtues of population genetic summary statistics: Detecting selective sweeps in recent divergences.
    Schneider K; White TJ; Mitchell S; Adams CE; Reeve R; Elmer KR
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Jun; 34(6):893-909. PubMed ID: 33185292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting Positive Selection in Populations Using Genetic Data.
    Koropoulis A; Alachiotis N; Pavlidis P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():87-123. PubMed ID: 31975165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the occurrence of classic selective sweeps in humans using whole-genome sequencing data sets.
    Fagny M; Patin E; Enard D; Barreiro LB; Quintana-Murci L; Laval G
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Jul; 31(7):1850-68. PubMed ID: 24694833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptation in structured populations and fuzzy boundaries between hard and soft sweeps.
    Zheng Y; Wiehe T
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Nov; 15(11):e1007426. PubMed ID: 31710623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.