These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26314586)

  • 1. Patterns of interaction-dominant dynamics in individual versus collaborative memory foraging.
    Szary J; Dale R; Kello CT; Rhodes T
    Cogn Process; 2015 Nov; 16(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 26314586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists.
    Hyman IE; Cardwell BA; Roy RA
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):875-90. PubMed ID: 23439153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 22686851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering.
    Weldon MS; Bellinger KD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1160-1175. PubMed ID: 9293627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collaboration and prospective memory: comparing nominal and collaborative group performance in strangers and couples.
    Browning CA; Harris CB; Van Bergen P; Barnier AJ; Rendell PG
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1206-1219. PubMed ID: 29388873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition?
    Dahlström Ö; Danielsson H; Emilsson M; Andersson J
    Memory; 2011 Feb; 19(2):140-54. PubMed ID: 21331969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing individual and collaborative eyewitness memory with category clustering recall.
    Thorley C
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1128-1139. PubMed ID: 29376763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Collaborative recall of details of an emotional film.
    Wessel I; Zandstra AR; Hengeveld HM; Moulds ML
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 24628679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collaborative remembering revisited: Study context access modulates collaborative inhibition and later benefits for individual memory.
    Abel M; Bäuml KT
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1319-1334. PubMed ID: 28770540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collaborative inhibition effect: the role of memory task and retrieval method.
    Saraiva M; Albuquerque PB; Garrido MV
    Psychol Res; 2023 Nov; 87(8):2548-2558. PubMed ID: 37027039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foraging in Semantic Fields: How We Search Through Memory.
    Hills TT; Todd PM; Jones MN
    Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 7(3):513-34. PubMed ID: 26097107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recalling items from a category for 1 hour: an inquiry into power-law behavior and memory foraging.
    Rhodes T
    Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2013 Jul; 17(3):361-84. PubMed ID: 23735492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of multiple trials and computer-mediated communication on collaborative and individual semantic recall.
    Hinds JM; Payne SJ
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 28750599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 18324549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic search and working memory in social recall.
    Hills TT; Pachur T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):218-28. PubMed ID: 21859235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival processing eliminates collaborative inhibition.
    Reysen MB; Bliss H; Baker MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1340-1347. PubMed ID: 28398121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task.
    Meade ML; Nokes TJ; Morrow DG
    Memory; 2009 Jan; 17(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 19105086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term and long-term collaboration benefits on individual recall in younger and older adults.
    Blumen HM; Stern Y
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 21264617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.