BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26314605)

  • 1. Retention of Moisture-tolerant and Conventional Resin-based Sealant in Six- to Nine-year-old Children.
    Khatri SG; Samuel SR; Acharya S; Patil S; Madan K
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 26314605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Assessment of Retention and Caries Protective Effectiveness of a Hydrophilic and a Conventional Sealant-A Clinical Trial.
    Beresescu L; Pacurar M; Vlasa A; Stoica AM; Dako T; Petcu B; Eșian D
    Children (Basel); 2022 Apr; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 35626822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
    Erdemir U; Sancakli HS; Yaman BC; Ozel S; Yucel T; Yıldız E
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of moisture-tolerant fluoride-releasing sealant and amorphous calcium phosphate-containing sealant in 6-9-year-old children: A randomized controlled trial.
    Khatri SG; Madan KA; Srinivasan SR; Acharya S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(1):92-98. PubMed ID: 30804314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of a moisture-tolerant material for fissure sealing: a prospective randomised clinical trial.
    Schlueter N; Klimek J; Ganss C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):711-6. PubMed ID: 22552593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of acid versus laser etching on the clinical performance of a fissure sealant: 24-month results.
    Karaman E; Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 23092148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant.
    Autio-Gold JT
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 12120768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study.
    Gorseta K; Glavina D; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Van Duinen RN; Skrinjaric I; Hill RG; Lynch E
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Jun; 22(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 25134364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of primer and bond in sealant retention and caries prevention.
    Mascarenhas AK; Nazar H; Al-Mutawaa S; Soparkar P
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 18402095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of two resin based fissure sealants: a comparative clinical study.
    Bhatia MR; Patel AR; Shirol DD
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 23263426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of fissure sealants using two different methods of application in teeth with hypomineralised molars (MIH): a 4 year clinical study.
    Lygidakis NA; Dimou G; Stamataki E
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Dec; 10(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 19995506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of a self-etching adhesive on sealant retention in primary teeth.
    Maher MM; Elkashlan HI; El-Housseiny AA
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 23930635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students.
    Ulusu T; Odabaş ME; Tüzüner T; Baygin O; Sillelioğlu H; Deveci C; Gökdoğan FG; Altuntaş A
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Apr; 13(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 22449810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials.
    Amin HE
    J Dent Hyg; 2008; 82(5):45. PubMed ID: 19055885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention of fissure sealants in young permanent molars affected by dental fluorosis: a 12-month clinical study.
    Hasanuddin S; Reddy ER; Manjula M; Srilaxmi N; Rani ST; Rajesh A
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Oct; 15(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 24737141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a one-step conditioning agent in sealant placement: 6-month results.
    Burbridge L; Nugent Z; Deery C
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2006 Nov; 16(6):424-30. PubMed ID: 17014541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 2-year clinical performance of a fluoride-containing fissure sealant in young schoolchildren at caries risk.
    Carlsson A; Petersson M; Twetman S
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 9545884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Resin-based Sealants: A Clinical Study.
    Mohanraj M; Prabhu R; Thomas E; Kumar S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):812-817. PubMed ID: 31597801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
    Antonson SA; Antonson DE; Brener S; Crutchfield J; Larumbe J; Michaud C; Yazici AR; Hardigan PC; Alempour S; Evans D; Ocanto R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Caries-preventive efficacy and retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant: a 3-year split-mouth randomised clinical trial.
    Baseggio W; Naufel FS; Davidoff DC; Nahsan FP; Flury S; Rodrigues JA
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2010; 8(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 20848004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.