These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26315434)

  • 1. SEXUAL SELECTION. Irrationality in mate choice revealed by túngara frogs.
    Lea AM; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6251):964-6. PubMed ID: 26315434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nineteen Years of Consistently Positive and Strong Female Mate Preferences despite Individual Variation.
    Ryan MJ; Akre KL; Baugh AT; Bernal XE; Lea AM; Leslie C; Still MB; Wylie DC; Rand AS
    Am Nat; 2019 Aug; 194(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 31318282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2235-47. PubMed ID: 17956386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neurobiology of Female Mate Choice in Frogs: Auditory Filtering and Valuation.
    Burmeister SS
    Integr Comp Biol; 2017 Oct; 57(4):857-864. PubMed ID: 29048536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment with arginine vasotocin alters mating calls and decreases call attractiveness in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Whitney TK; Ryan MJ; Rand AS; Marler CA
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2010 Jan; 165(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 19576218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glucocorticoid-Mediated Changes in Male Green Treefrog Vocalizations Alter Attractiveness to Females.
    Leary CJ; Crocker-Buta S; Holloway A; Kennedy JGC
    Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Jul; 61(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33940612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Progesterone and prostaglandin F2α induce species-typical female preferences for male sexual displays in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Ward JL; Love EK; Baugh AT; Gordon NM; Tanner JC; Bee MA
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Dec; 152(Pt A):280-7. PubMed ID: 26454212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal perception in frogs and bats and the evolution of mating signals.
    Akre KL; Farris HE; Lea AM; Page RA; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6043):751-2. PubMed ID: 21817052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2608-18. PubMed ID: 14686535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational mate choice: theory and empirical evidence.
    Castellano S; Cadeddu G; Cermelli P
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 22410366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Categorical perception of a natural, multivariate signal: mating call recognition in túngara frogs.
    Baugh AT; Akre KL; Ryan MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jul; 105(26):8985-8. PubMed ID: 18577592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural activity patterns in response to interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating calls in the túngara frog.
    Chakraborty M; Mangiamele LA; Burmeister SS
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e12898. PubMed ID: 20877560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multimodal signal variation in space and time: how important is matching a signal with its signaler?
    Taylor RC; Klein BA; Stein J; Ryan MJ
    J Exp Biol; 2011 Mar; 214(Pt 5):815-20. PubMed ID: 21307068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estradiol induces sexual behavior in female túngara frogs.
    Chakraborty M; Burmeister SS
    Horm Behav; 2009 Jan; 55(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 18840446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
    Höbel G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand W; Hurd PL; Phelps SM; Rand AS
    Am Nat; 2003 Mar; 161(3):380-94. PubMed ID: 12699219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lack of phonotactic preferences of female frogs and its consequences for signal evolution.
    Velásquez NA; Valdés JL; Vásquez RA; Penna M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Sep; 118():76-84. PubMed ID: 26051194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.
    Neelon DP; Rodríguez RL; Höbel G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20182830. PubMed ID: 30963823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arginine vasotocin promotes calling behavior and call changes in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Whitney TK; Davis ES; Marler CA
    Brain Behav Evol; 2007; 69(4):254-65. PubMed ID: 17299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.