BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1054 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26315521)

  • 1. Prostate Cancer Screening and the Associated Controversy.
    Tabayoyong W; Abouassaly R
    Surg Clin North Am; 2015 Oct; 95(5):1023-39. PubMed ID: 26315521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
    ; Grossman DC; Curry SJ; Owens DK; Bibbins-Domingo K; Caughey AB; Davidson KW; Doubeni CA; Ebell M; Epling JW; Kemper AR; Krist AH; Kubik M; Landefeld CS; Mangione CM; Silverstein M; Simon MA; Siu AL; Tseng CW
    JAMA; 2018 May; 319(18):1901-1913. PubMed ID: 29801017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary care physician PSA screening practices before and after the final U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.
    Cohn JA; Wang CE; Lakeman JC; Silverstein JC; Brendler CB; Novakovic KR; McGuire MS; Helfand BT
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):41.e23-30. PubMed ID: 23911680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    Moyer VA;
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Jul; 157(2):120-34. PubMed ID: 22801674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risks of PSA screening now better understood.
    Peres J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Nov; 105(21):1590-2. PubMed ID: 24142893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer in older men in the United States of America.
    Black A; Berg CD
    Gerontology; 2012; 58(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 22343605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force statement on prostate-specific antigen screening: analysis of urologic and primary care practices.
    Perez TY; Danzig MR; Ghandour RA; Badani KK; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
    Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 25440819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for prostate cancer: the current evidence and guidelines controversy.
    Gomella LG; Liu XS; Trabulsi EJ; Kelly WK; Myers R; Showalter T; Dicker A; Wender R
    Can J Urol; 2011 Oct; 18(5):5875-83. PubMed ID: 22018148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Focus on the screening for prostate cancer by PSA].
    Roumeguère T; Van Velthoven R
    Rev Med Brux; 2013 Sep; 34(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 24195246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPTSTF) recommendations against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing on PSA testing in Australia.
    Zargar H; van den Bergh R; Moon D; Lawrentschuk N; Costello A; Murphy D
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 27454454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate-specific antigen testing: men's responses to 2012 recommendation against screening.
    Squiers LB; Bann CM; Dolina SE; Tzeng J; McCormack L; Kamerow D
    Am J Prev Med; 2013 Aug; 45(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 23867025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early detection, PSA screening, and management of overdiagnosis.
    Borza T; Konijeti R; Kibel AS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1091-110, vii. PubMed ID: 24188254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.
    Qaseem A; Barry MJ; Denberg TD; Owens DK; Shekelle P;
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 May; 158(10):761-769. PubMed ID: 23567643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force 'D' recommendation on prostate cancer screening and staging.
    Eapen RS; Herlemann A; Washington SL; Cooperberg MR
    Curr Opin Urol; 2017 May; 27(3):205-209. PubMed ID: 28221220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening for prostate cancer with PSA testing: current status and future directions.
    Croswell JM; Kramer BS; Crawford ED
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2011 May; 25(6):452-60, 463. PubMed ID: 21717898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.
    Misra-Hebert AD; Hu B; Klein EA; Stephenson A; Taksler GB; Kattan MW; Rothberg MB
    BJU Int; 2017 Aug; 120(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 28139034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term consequences of the USPSTF Grade D recommendation for prostate-specific antigen screening.
    Joshi SS; Filson CP
    Cancer; 2020 Feb; 126(4):694-696. PubMed ID: 31794066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National Prostate Cancer Screening Rates After the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Discouraging Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening.
    Drazer MW; Huo D; Eggener SE
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(22):2416-23. PubMed ID: 26056181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PSA measurement and prostate cancer--overdiagnosis and overtreatment?
    Breidablik HJ; Meland E; Aakre KM; Førde OH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Sep; 133(16):1711-6. PubMed ID: 24005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Fenton JJ; Weyrich MS; Durbin S; Liu Y; Bang H; Melnikow J
    JAMA; 2018 May; 319(18):1914-1931. PubMed ID: 29801018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.