These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26315542)

  • 1. Cutting efficiency of diamond burs operated with electric high-speed dental handpiece on zirconia.
    Nakamura K; Katsuda Y; Ankyu S; Harada A; Tenkumo T; Kanno T; Niwano Y; Egusa H; Milleding P; Örtengren U
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2015 Oct; 123(5):375-380. PubMed ID: 26315542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of cutting efficiency with different diamond burs and water flow rates in cutting lithium disilicate glass ceramic.
    Siegel SC; Patel T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Oct; 147(10):792-6. PubMed ID: 27346462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the cutting efficiency of different burs on zirconia substrate.
    Peters OA; Du D; Ho MY; Chu R; Moule A
    Aust Endod J; 2019 Dec; 45(3):289-297. PubMed ID: 30983118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bur Choice When Removing Zirconia Restorations.
    Keeling FL; Taft RM; Haney SJ
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):347-352. PubMed ID: 35771711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental cutting with diamond burs: heavy-handed or light-touch?
    Siegel SC; von Fraunhofer JA
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Mar; 8(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 10356549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cutting efficiency of three diamond bur grit sizes.
    Siegel SC; von Fraunhofer JA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Dec; 131(12):1706-10. PubMed ID: 11143734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of the cutting efficiency of diamond rotary instruments with different grit sizes with a low-speed electric handpiece against zirconia specimens.
    van Aswegen A; Jagathpal AJ; Sykes LM; Schoeman H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):101.e1-101.e8. PubMed ID: 37925249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of the cutting efficiency and working life of carbide burs.
    Di Cristofaro RG; Giner L; Mayoral JR
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 23387508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing cutting efficiencies of diamond burs using a high-speed electric handpiece.
    Chung EM; Sung EC; Wu B; Caputo AA
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 16903197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In-process assessment of dental cutting of a leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic.
    Song XF; Yin L; Han YG
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Mar; 31(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 18757231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.
    Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced dental cutting through chemomechanical effects.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Siegel SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Oct; 131(10):1465-9. PubMed ID: 11042986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro assessment of cutting efficiency and durability of zirconia removal diamond rotary instruments.
    Kim JS; Bae JH; Yun MJ; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):775-783. PubMed ID: 27817828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Examination of the mechanical properties of zirconia and porcelain blocks after grinding with smooth and coarse diamond burrs].
    Shemer S; Hendler A; Pilo R; Weiss E; Perez-Davidi M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2014 Apr; 31(2):31-9, 87. PubMed ID: 25252469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of cutting rates among single-patient-use and multiple-patient-use diamond burs.
    Pilcher ES; Tietge JD; Draughn RA
    J Prosthodont; 2000 Jun; 9(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11070132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of cutting efficiencies between electric and air-turbine dental handpieces.
    Choi C; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 20141814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of diamond rotary instruments marketed for removing zirconia restorations.
    Hunziker S; Thorpe L; Zitzmann NU; Rohr N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 36153187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Handpiece coolant flow rates and dental cutting.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Siegel SC; Feldman S
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):544-8. PubMed ID: 11203868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process.
    Song XF; Ren HT; Yin L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jan; 53():78-92. PubMed ID: 26318569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.