These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26315718)

  • 1. How to take non-knowledge seriously, or "the unexpected virtue of ignorance".
    Nielsen KH; Sørensen MP
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Apr; 26(3):385-392. PubMed ID: 26315718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communicating science in politicized environments.
    Lupia A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14048-54. PubMed ID: 23940336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
    Meyer G
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):433-46. PubMed ID: 27117771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When science becomes too easy: Science popularization inclines laypeople to underrate their dependence on experts.
    Scharrer L; Rupieper Y; Stadtler M; Bromme R
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Nov; 26(8):1003-1018. PubMed ID: 27899471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Importance of Bringing Science and Medicine to Lay Audiences.
    Bass E
    Circulation; 2016 Jun; 133(23):2334-7. PubMed ID: 27267539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward a manifesto for the 'public understanding of big data'.
    Michael M; Lupton D
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):104-16. PubMed ID: 26468128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Was Sir William Crookes epistemically virtuous?
    Kidd IJ
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Dec; 48 Pt A():67-74. PubMed ID: 25091260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The social construction of competence: Conceptions of science and expertise among proponents of the low-carbohydrate high-fat diet in Finland.
    Jauho M
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Apr; 25(3):332-45. PubMed ID: 25415233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
    Raps BG
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):460-4. PubMed ID: 27117773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences.
    Suldovsky B
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 27117769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? How do the shifting information flows in healthcare affect the deficit model of science communication?
    Ko H
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 27117770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? The eternal recurrence of the public deficit.
    Cortassa C
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 27117772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unbalanced progress: The hard road from science popularisation to public engagement with science in China.
    Jia H; Liu L
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 24434709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dolly, cloning, and the public misunderstanding of science: a challenge for us all.
    Klotzko AJ
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(2):115-6. PubMed ID: 9532386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Portals, blogs and co.: the role of the Internet as a medium of science communication.
    Minol K; Spelsberg G; Schulte E; Morris N
    Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1129-40. PubMed ID: 17703484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The changing uses of accuracy in science communication.
    Hansen A
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Oct; 25(7):760-774. PubMed ID: 26960909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.
    Sturgis P; Cooper H; Fife-Schaw C
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):31-56. PubMed ID: 16552916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic jargon identifier for scientists engaging with the public and science communication educators.
    Rakedzon T; Segev E; Chapnik N; Yosef R; Baram-Tsabari A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181742. PubMed ID: 28792945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The pandemic of the experts in the mass media. How to create trust in public communication by acknowledging ignorance and uncertainty].
    Stollorz V
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2013 Jan; 56(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 23275963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.