BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26316688)

  • 1. Erratum: Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum].
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1475. PubMed ID: 26316688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems.
    Chen M; Anderson E; Hill G; Chen JJ; Patrianakos T
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1367-72. PubMed ID: 26229430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of IOP based infusion system with and without balanced phaco tip on cumulative dissipated energy and estimated fluid usage in comparison to gravity fed infusion in torsional phacoemulsification.
    Malik PK; Dewan T; Patidar AK; Sain E
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2017; 4():22. PubMed ID: 28932753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-fluidics.
    Gonzalez-Salinas R; Garza-Leon M; Saenz-de-Viteri M; Solis-S JC; Gulias-Cañizo R; Quiroz-Mercado H
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 38(5):1907-1913. PubMed ID: 28831699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems.
    Sharif-Kashani P; Fanney D; Injev V
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 14():96. PubMed ID: 25074069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective study of Centurion
    Oh LJ; Nguyen CL; Wong E; Wang SSY; Francis IC
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2017; 10(11):1698-1702. PubMed ID: 29181313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. COMPARISON OF RECENTLY USED PHACOEMULSIFICATION SYSTEMS USING A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT METHOD.
    Huang J; Wang Q; Zhao C; Ying X; Zou H
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 28679456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corrigendum.
    Paediatr Child Health; 2015; 20(8):466-7. PubMed ID: 26744561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Erratum: Outcomes of combined trabecular micro-bypass and phacoemulsification in a predominantly Hispanic patient population [Corrigendum].
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():2475. PubMed ID: 28003736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Erratum: Intracameral phenylephrine and ketorolac injection (OMS302) for maintenance of intraoperative pupil diameter and reduction of postoperative pain in intraocular lens replacement with phacoemulsification [Corrigendum].
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():181. PubMed ID: 25655930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in energy expenditure for conventional and femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery using 2 different phacoemulsification systems.
    Yesilirmak N; Diakonis VF; Sise A; Waren DP; Yoo SH; Donaldson KE
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 28317672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Infiniti vision and the series 20,000 Legacy systems.
    Fernández de Castro LE; Solomon KD; Hu DJ; Vroman DT; Sandoval HP
    Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 18303229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A rapid technique for en masse soft cataract phacoemulsification.
    Om Parkash R; Mahajan S; Om Parkash T; Vajpayee RB; Om Parkash T
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():755-762. PubMed ID: 31114153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control.
    Solomon KD; Lorente R; Fanney D; Cionni RJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Apr; 42(4):542-9. PubMed ID: 27113876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Erratum: A randomized direct comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of apixaban and rivaroxaban [Corrigendum.
    Clin Pharmacol; 2018; 10():71. PubMed ID: 29928148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corrigendum.
    Sun XH; Yu HZ; Yang MM; Yang YM; Dang ZM
    J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle; 2015 Jun; 6(2):192. PubMed ID: 26140254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of ultrasonic energy expenditures and corneal endothelial cell density reductions during modulated and non-modulated phacoemulsification.
    Davison JA
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2007; 38(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 17552387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Erratum: corrigendum.
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2011; 5():1557. PubMed ID: 22125401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Erratum: Cost analysis of pulmonary lobectomy procedure: comparison of stapler versus precision dissection and sealant [Corrigendum].
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2018; 10():155. PubMed ID: 29559803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Erratum: Comparison of the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients requiring hospital admission to treat eosinophilic and neutrophilic exacerbations of COPD [Corrigendum].
    Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis; 2017; 12():229. PubMed ID: 28138231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.