184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26317655)
1. Assessing Habitat Use by Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) from Baited Underwater Video Data in a Coastal Marine Park.
Terres MA; Lawrence E; Hosack GR; Haywood MD; Babcock RC
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136799. PubMed ID: 26317655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decadal Changes in the Abundance and Length of Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) in Subtropical Marine Sanctuaries.
Malcolm HA; Schultz AL; Sachs P; Johnstone N; Jordan A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127616. PubMed ID: 26061036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Remote high-definition rotating video enables fast spatial survey of marine underwater macrofauna and habitats.
Pelletier D; Leleu K; Mallet D; Mou-Tham G; Hervé G; Boureau M; Guilpart N
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e30536. PubMed ID: 22383965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consistent multi-level trophic effects of marine reserve protection across northern New Zealand.
Edgar GJ; Stuart-Smith RD; Thomson RJ; Freeman DJ
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177216. PubMed ID: 28542268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying fish assemblages in large, offshore marine protected areas: an Australian case study.
Hill NA; Barrett N; Lawrence E; Hulls J; Dambacher JM; Nichol S; Williams A; Hayes KR
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110831. PubMed ID: 25360763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing two remote video survey methods for spatial predictions of the distribution and environmental niche suitability of demersal fishes.
Galaiduk R; Radford BT; Wilson SK; Harvey ES
Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17633. PubMed ID: 29247193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Illegal recreational fishing causes a decline in a fishery targeted species (Snapper: Chrysophrys auratus) within a remote no-take marine protected area.
Harasti D; Davis TR; Jordan A; Erskine L; Moltschaniwskyj N
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209926. PubMed ID: 30620736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanisms explaining nursery habitat association: how do juvenile snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) benefit from their nursery habitat?
Parsons DM; Middleton C; Spong KT; Mackay G; Smith MD; Buckthought D
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122137. PubMed ID: 25803443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Taking a deeper look: Quantifying the differences in fish assemblages between shallow and mesophotic temperate rocky reefs.
Williams J; Jordan A; Harasti D; Davies P; Ingleton T
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0206778. PubMed ID: 30875385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterizing ontogenetic habitat shifts in marine fishes: advancing nascent methods for marine spatial management.
Galaiduk R; Radford BT; Saunders BJ; Newman SJ; Harvey ES
Ecol Appl; 2017 Sep; 27(6):1776-1788. PubMed ID: 28452413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons among survey methodologies to test for abundance and size of a highly targeted fish species.
Gardner JP; Struthers CD
J Fish Biol; 2013 Jan; 82(1):242-62. PubMed ID: 23331148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chapter 4. Susceptibility of sharks, rays and chimaeras to global extinction.
Field IC; Meekan MG; Buckworth RC; Bradshaw CJ
Adv Mar Biol; 2009; 56():275-363. PubMed ID: 19895977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of motorboat sound on Australian snapper
Mensinger AF; Putland RL; Radford CA
Ecol Evol; 2018 Jul; 8(13):6438-6448. PubMed ID: 30038746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of depth and a subsea pipeline on fish assemblages and commercially fished species.
Bond T; Partridge JC; Taylor MD; Cooper TF; McLean DL
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207703. PubMed ID: 30475853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coastal fish assemblages reflect marine habitat connectivity and ontogenetic shifts in an estuary-bay-continental shelf gradient.
Reis-Filho JA; Schmid K; Harvey ES; Giarrizzo T
Mar Environ Res; 2019 Jun; 148():57-66. PubMed ID: 31102903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sessile and mobile components of a benthic ecosystem display mixed trends within a temperate marine reserve.
Howarth LM; Pickup SE; Evans LE; Cross TJ; Hawkins JP; Roberts CM; Stewart BD
Mar Environ Res; 2015 Jun; 107():8-23. PubMed ID: 25863362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PelagiCam: a novel underwater imaging system with computer vision for semi-automated monitoring of mobile marine fauna at offshore structures.
Sheehan EV; Bridger D; Nancollas SJ; Pittman SJ
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Dec; 192(1):11. PubMed ID: 31807930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Habitat continuity effects on gradients of fish biomass across marine protected area boundaries.
Forcada A; Bayle-Sempere JT; Valle C; Sánchez-Jerez P
Mar Environ Res; 2008 Dec; 66(5):536-47. PubMed ID: 18829099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Network of small no-take marine reserves reveals greater abundance and body size of fisheries target species.
Rolim FA; Langlois T; Rodrigues PFC; Bond T; Motta FS; Neves LM; Gadig OBF
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0204970. PubMed ID: 30629577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using EUNIS habitat classification for benthic mapping in European seas: present concerns and future needs.
Galparsoro I; Connor DW; Borja A; Aish A; Amorim P; Bajjouk T; Chambers C; Coggan R; Dirberg G; Ellwood H; Evans D; Goodin KL; Grehan A; Haldin J; Howell K; Jenkins C; Michez N; Mo G; Buhl-Mortensen P; Pearce B; Populus J; Salomidi M; Sánchez F; Serrano A; Shumchenia E; Tempera F; Vasquez M
Mar Pollut Bull; 2012 Dec; 64(12):2630-8. PubMed ID: 23117202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
