146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26317785)
1. When Is Rapid On-Site Evaluation Cost-Effective for Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy?
Schmidt RL; Walker BS; Cohen MB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135466. PubMed ID: 26317785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk-benefit analysis of sampling methods for fine-needle aspiration cytology: a mathematical modeling approach.
Schmidt RL; Kordy MA; Howard K; Layfield LJ; Hall BJ; Adler DG
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Mar; 139(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 23429370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The comparative effectiveness of fine-needle aspiration cytology sampling policies: a simulation study.
Schmidt RL; Howard K; Hall BJ; Layfield LJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Dec; 138(6):823-30. PubMed ID: 23161716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mathematical modelling can predict adequacy rates and needle passes for fine needle aspiration cytology with rapid on-site evaluation.
Schmidt RL; Kordy MA
Cytopathology; 2015 Aug; 26(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 24975327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid on-site evaluation reduces needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: a risk-benefit analysis.
Schmidt RL; Walker BS; Howard K; Layfield LJ; Adler DG
Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(11):3280-6. PubMed ID: 23824404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative cost-effectiveness of fine needle aspiration biopsy versus image-guided biopsy, and open surgical biopsy in the evaluation of breast cancer in the era of Affordable Care Act: a changing landscape.
Masood S; Rosa M; Kraemer DF; Smotherman C; Mohammadi A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Aug; 43(8):605-12. PubMed ID: 25722099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of rapid on-site evaluation of the adequacy of FNA cytology samples performed by nonpathologists.
Pearson LN; Layfield LJ; Schmidt RL
Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Oct; 126(10):839-845. PubMed ID: 30311738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of palpation-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy to ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.
Cesur M; Corapcioglu D; Bulut S; Gursoy A; Yilmaz AE; Erdogan N; Kamel N
Thyroid; 2006 Jun; 16(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 16839257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy versus ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: cost-effectiveness as a frontline diagnostic modality for solitary thyroid nodules.
Khalid AN; Quraishi SA; Hollenbeak CS; Stack BC
Head Neck; 2008 Aug; 30(8):1035-9. PubMed ID: 18442056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fine-Needle Aspiration Followed by Core-Needle Biopsy in the Same Setting: Modifying Our Approach.
Joudeh AA; Shareef SQ; Al-Abbadi MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 26963594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neck lump clinics: is on-site assessment of fine needle aspirate diagnostic adequacy cost-effective?
Burgess C; Dias L; Maughan E; Moorthy R
J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Nov; 127(11):1122-6. PubMed ID: 24131944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.
Mortensen MB
Dan Med J; 2012 Dec; 59(12):B4568. PubMed ID: 23290296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparison of cytological specimen adequacy assessment by different rapid staining techniques for rapid on-site evaluation in fine needle aspiration cytology and their cost-effectiveness.
Agarwal P; Toi PC; Subramaniam H; Apoorva Lakshmi S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 May; 47(5):469-474. PubMed ID: 30585436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine on-site evaluation of specimen adequacy during initial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Zanocco K; Pitelka-Zengou L; Dalal S; Elaraj D; Nayar R; Sturgeon C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2462-7. PubMed ID: 23529781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomography-guided transthoracic fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of lung cancer: a comparison of single-pass needle and multiple-pass coaxial needle systems and the value of immediate cytological assessment.
Küçük CU; Yilmaz A; Yilmaz A; Akkaya E
Respirology; 2004 Aug; 9(3):392-6. PubMed ID: 15363014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the quality of smears in transbronchial fine-needle aspirates using two staining methods for rapid on-site evaluation.
Louw M; Brundyn K; Schubert PT; Wright CA; Bolliger CT; Diacon AH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Sep; 40(9):777-81. PubMed ID: 21322124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Number of Passes and Cytopathological Specimen Adequacy for Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in the Absence of an On-Site Pathologist.
Kuzan TY; Canbey Goret C
Eur Thyroid J; 2020 Jan; 9(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 32071902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of rapid onsite evaluation on the adequacy rate of fine-needle aspiration cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schmidt RL; Witt BL; Lopez-Calderon LE; Layfield LJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Mar; 139(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 23429365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid on-site evaluation of fine needle aspiration specimens by cytology scientists: a review of 3032 specimens.
Shield PW; Cosier J; Ellerby G; Gartrell M; Papadimos D
Cytopathology; 2014 Oct; 25(5):322-9. PubMed ID: 24844295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
