These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26318112)

  • 1. Improving point correspondence in cephalograms by using a two-stage rectified point transform.
    Tam WK; Lee HJ
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Oct; 65():114-23. PubMed ID: 26318112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Landmarking of cephalograms using a microcomputer system.
    Tong W; Nugent ST; Gregson PH; Jensen GM; Fay DF
    Comput Biomed Res; 1990 Aug; 23(4):358-79. PubMed ID: 2394093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lateral cephalometric analysis for treatment planning in orthodontics based on MRI compared with radiographs: A feasibility study in children and adolescents.
    Heil A; Lazo Gonzalez E; Hilgenfeld T; Kickingereder P; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Ozga AK; Sommer A; Lux CJ; Zingler S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174524. PubMed ID: 28334054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of Kohonen network for automatic point correspondence in 2D medical images.
    Markaki VE; Asvestas PA; Matsopoulos GK
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Jul; 39(7):630-45. PubMed ID: 19481734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic landmarking of cephalograms.
    Parthasarathy S; Nugent ST; Gregson PG; Fay DF
    Comput Biomed Res; 1989 Jun; 22(3):248-69. PubMed ID: 2721174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. n-SIFT: n-dimensional scale invariant feature transform.
    Cheung W; Hamarneh G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Sep; 18(9):2012-21. PubMed ID: 19502129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Landmark Reliability between Manual and Computerized Plotting Methods.
    Kasinathan G; Kommi PB; Kumar SM; Yashwant A; Arani N; Sabapathy S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(4):317-321. PubMed ID: 28349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of image compression of digital lateral cephalograms on the reproducibility of cephalometric points.
    Duarte H; Vieck R; Siqueira DF; Angelieri F; Bommarito S; Dalben G; Sannomiya EK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):393-400. PubMed ID: 19700533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
    Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
    Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Individualized three-dimensional finite element model of facial soft tissue and preliminary application in orthodontics].
    Chen S; Xu TM; Lou HD; Rong QG
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 47(12):730-4. PubMed ID: 23328098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parameter space warping: shape-based correspondence between morphologically different objects.
    Meier D; Fisher E
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jan; 21(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 11838662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Development of a computerized automatic identification system for use in cephalometry].
    Li S; Wu Q; Zhang H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):466-8. PubMed ID: 12641966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
    Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing superimposition error of 3D cephalometric landmarks by plane orientation method using 4 reference points: 4 point superimposition error regression model.
    Hwang JJ; Kim KD; Park H; Park CS; Jeong HG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110665. PubMed ID: 25372707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning new parts for landmark localization in whole-body CT scans.
    Potesil V; Kadir T; Brady M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Apr; 33(4):836-48. PubMed ID: 24710153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Volume registration using needle paths and point landmarks for evaluation of interventional MRI treatments.
    Lazebnik RS; Lancaster TL; Breen MS; Lewin JS; Wilson DL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 May; 22(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 12846434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Liu JK; Chen YT; Cheng KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 11094367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An iterative point correspondence algorithm for automatic image registration: an application to dental subtraction radiography.
    Markaki VE; Asvestas PA; Matsopoulos GK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jan; 93(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18760858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 68.