These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
768 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26318314)
1. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor. Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients]. Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) as indicators of fluid responsiveness in sevoflurane anesthetized mechanically ventilated euvolemic dogs. Endo Y; Tamura J; Ishizuka T; Itami T; Hanazono K; Miyoshi K; Sano T; Yamashita K; Muir WW J Vet Med Sci; 2017 Aug; 79(8):1437-1445. PubMed ID: 28690287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study. Vos JJ; Poterman M; Salm PP; Van Amsterdam K; Struys MM; Scheeren TW; Kalmar AF Can J Anaesth; 2015 Nov; 62(11):1153-60. PubMed ID: 26335905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients experiencing intra-abdominal hypertension. Liu X; Fu Q; Mi W; Liu H; Zhang H; Wang P Biosci Trends; 2013 Apr; 7(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23612080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effective evaluation of arterial pulse waveform analysis by two-dimensional stroke volume variation-stroke volume index plots. Sawa T; Kinoshita M; Kainuma A; Akiyama K; Naito Y; Kato H; Amaya F; Shigemi K J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Oct; 31(5):927-941. PubMed ID: 27492429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock]. Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, and pleth variability index in predicting fluid responsiveness during different positive end expiratory pressure in prone position. Chen Y; Fu Q; Mi WD Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2015 Apr; 37(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 25936706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluid Challenge During Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Messina A; Pelaia C; Bruni A; Garofalo E; Bonicolini E; Longhini F; Dellara E; Saderi L; Romagnoli S; Sotgiu G; Cecconi M; Navalesi P Anesth Analg; 2018 Dec; 127(6):1353-1364. PubMed ID: 30300177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery. Piccioni F; Bernasconi F; Tramontano GTA; Langer M J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 27306799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery. Trepte CJ; Eichhorn V; Haas SA; Stahl K; Schmid F; Nitzschke R; Goetz AE; Reuter DA Br J Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 111(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 23811425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation. Jun JH; Chung RK; Baik HJ; Chung MH; Hyeon JS; Lee YG; Park SH BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):142. PubMed ID: 31390982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional hemodynamic parameters do not reflect volume responsiveness in the immediate phase after acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Kronas N; Kubitz JC; Forkl S; Kemming GI; Goetz AE; Reuter DA J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):780-3. PubMed ID: 21115364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation. Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with thoracic kyphosis. Chen Y; Guo X; Fu J; Dong T; Liu X; Lv H Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jul; 10(7):7571-7578. PubMed ID: 34154341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Biais M; Bernard O; Ha JC; Degryse C; Sztark F Br J Anaesth; 2010 Apr; 104(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 20190260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic arterial elastance as a predictor of arterial pressure response to fluid administration: a validation study. García MI; Romero MG; Cano AG; Aya HD; Rhodes A; Grounds RM; Cecconi M Crit Care; 2014 Nov; 18(6):626. PubMed ID: 25407570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]