145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26318559)
1. Surface Charge Measurement of SonoVue, Definity and Optison: A Comparison of Laser Doppler Electrophoresis and Micro-Electrophoresis.
Ja'afar F; Leow CH; Garbin V; Sennoga CA; Tang MX; Seddon JM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26318559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics and Echogenicity of Clinical Ultrasound Contrast Agents: An In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison Study.
Hyvelin JM; Gaud E; Costa M; Helbert A; Bussat P; Bettinger T; Frinking P
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 May; 36(5):941-953. PubMed ID: 28240842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles.
Grishenkov D; Kari L; Brodin LK; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20542310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gene transfer with microbubble ultrasound and plasmid DNA into skeletal muscle of mice: comparison between commercially available microbubble contrast agents.
Wang X; Liang HD; Dong B; Lu QL; Blomley MJ
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):224-9. PubMed ID: 16081853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of ultrasound pulses combined with Definity for targeted blood-brain barrier disruption: a feasibility study.
McDannold N; Vykhodtseva N; Hynynen K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 33(4):584-90. PubMed ID: 17337109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous grayscale and subharmonic ultrasound imaging on a modified commercial scanner.
Eisenbrey JR; Dave JK; Halldorsdottir VG; Merton DA; Machado P; Liu JB; Miller C; Gonzalez JM; Park S; Dianis S; Chalek CL; Thomenius KE; Brown DB; Navarro V; Forsberg F
Ultrasonics; 2011 Dec; 51(8):890-7. PubMed ID: 21621239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hepatic vein transit time of SonoVue: a comparative study with Levovist.
Lim AK; Patel N; Eckersley RJ; Goldin RD; Thomas HC; Cosgrove DO; Taylor-Robinson SD; Blomley MJ
Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):130-5. PubMed ID: 16720867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microbubble stability is a major determinant of the efficiency of ultrasound and microbubble mediated in vivo gene transfer.
Alter J; Sennoga CA; Lopes DM; Eckersley RJ; Wells DJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 35(6):976-84. PubMed ID: 19285783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of ultrasound contrast agents on Doppler tissue velocity estimation.
Ressner M; Brodin LA; Jansson T; Hoff L; Ask P; Janerot-Sjoberg B
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Feb; 19(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 16455419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acoustic Characterization and Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Long-Circulating Lipid-Coated Microbubbles.
Li H; Yang Y; Zhang M; Yin L; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 May; 37(5):1243-1256. PubMed ID: 29127707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potentiating intra-arterial sonothrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke by the addition of the ultrasound contrast agents (Optison™ & SonoVue(®)).
Soltani A; Singhal R; Obtera M; Roy RA; Clark WM; Hansmann DR
J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2011 Jan; 31(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 20473551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro acoustic characterisation of four intravenous ultrasonic contrast agents at 30 MHz.
Moran CM; Watson RJ; Fox KA; McDicken WN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Jun; 28(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 12113791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Needle and Catheter Size on Commercially Available Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Eisenbrey JR; Daecher A; Kramer MR; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1961-8. PubMed ID: 26384606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of a novel ultrasound contrast agent with long persistence on right ventricular pressure: Comparison with SonoVue.
Liu P; Wang X; Zhou S; Hua X; Liu Z; Gao Y
Ultrasonics; 2011 Feb; 51(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 20825961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of repetitive contrast agent injections on functional and molecular ultrasound measurements.
Rix A; Palmowski M; Gremse F; Palmowski K; Lederle W; Kiessling F; Bzyl J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2468-75. PubMed ID: 25023096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo study of microbubbles as an MR susceptibility contrast agent.
Wong KK; Huang I; Kim YR; Tang H; Yang ES; Kwong KK; Wu EX
Magn Reson Med; 2004 Sep; 52(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15334560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do microbubbles interact differently with leukocytes?
Rubin JM
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):604-5. PubMed ID: 14990826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of the Sensitivity of Contrast-Specific Imaging Modes on Clinical and Preclinical Ultrasound Scanners.
Moran CM; Arthur C; Quaia E
Tomography; 2022 Sep; 8(5):2285-2297. PubMed ID: 36136887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pharmacokinetics of echocontrast agent infusion in a dog model.
Kaps M; Seidel G; Algermissen C; Gerriets T; Broillet A
J Neuroimaging; 2001 Jul; 11(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 11462298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Synthesis of laboratory Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Park J; Park D; Shin U; Moon S; Kim C; Kim HS; Park H; Choi K; Jung B; Oh J; Seo J
Molecules; 2013 Oct; 18(10):13078-95. PubMed ID: 24152677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
