BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26318974)

  • 1. Psychoanalytic principles as a heuristic framework to bridge the gap between psychology and the law in SVP evaluations: Assessing emotional and volitional impairment.
    Simon EP
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():154-67. PubMed ID: 26318974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexually Violent Predator Law in the United States.
    Felthous AR; Ko J
    East Asian Arch Psychiatry; 2018 Dec; 28(4):159-173. PubMed ID: 30563954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Case Law Considerations in the Use of ASPD in SVP/SDP Evaluations.
    Sreenivasan S; Rokop J; DiCiro M; Colley J; Weinberger LE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Jun; 48(2):181-190. PubMed ID: 32079646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexually violent predator evaluations: empirical evidence, strategies for professionals, and research directions.
    Miller HA; Amenta AE; Conroy MA
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Feb; 29(1):29-54. PubMed ID: 15865331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volitional impairment and the sexually violent predator.
    Grinage BD
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jul; 48(4):861-8. PubMed ID: 12877308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the scope of questionable diagnostic reliability in Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) evaluations.
    Perillo AD; Spada AH; Calkins C; Jeglic EL
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 24274914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role and reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: a case law survey.
    DeMatteo D; Edens JF; Galloway M; Cox J; Smith ST; Formon D
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24127888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personality Assessment Inventory Scores as Predictors of Evaluation Referrals, Evaluator Opinions, and Commitment Decisions in Sexually Violent Predator Cases.
    Boccaccini MT; Harris PB; Schrantz K; Varela JG
    J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(5):472-480. PubMed ID: 28145746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antisocial personality disorder is not enough: a reply to Sreenivasan, Weinberger, and Garrick.
    Vognsen J; Phenix A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):440-2. PubMed ID: 15704629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexually violent predators: the risky enterprise of risk assessment.
    Rogers R; Jackson RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 16394230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Violent sex offenses: how are they best measured from official records?
    Rice ME; Harris GT; Lang C; Cormier C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):525-41. PubMed ID: 16770703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Normative versus consequential ethics in sexually violent predator laws: an ethics conundrum for psychiatry.
    Sreenivasan S; Frances A; Weinberger LE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(3):386-91. PubMed ID: 20852225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mental disorder, predisposition, prediction, and ability to control: evaluating sex offenders for civil commitment.
    Elwood RW
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Dec; 21(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 19901235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision-making about volitional impairment in sexually violent predators.
    Mercado CC; Bornstein BH; Schopp RF
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):587-602. PubMed ID: 16951926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expert testimony in sexually violent predator commitments: conceptualizing legal standards of "mental disorder" and "likely to reoffend".
    Sreenivasan S; Weinberger LE; Garrick T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):471-85. PubMed ID: 14974803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The biasing effect of the "sexually violent predator" label on legal decisions.
    Scurich N; Gongola J; Krauss DA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 47():109-14. PubMed ID: 27206709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The pervert, the law and the therapist].
    Reznik F
    Soins Psychiatr; 1999; (202):16-7. PubMed ID: 10693536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases.
    First MB; Halon RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 19092060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexually violent predators and civil commitment laws.
    Kendall WD; Cheung M
    J Child Sex Abus; 2004; 13(2):41-57. PubMed ID: 15388411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loathing the sinner, medicalizing the sin: why sexually violent predator statutes are unjust.
    Douard J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 17157910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.