These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26319105)

  • 1. Racial and Gender Influences on Pass Rates for the UK and Ireland Specialty Board Examinations.
    Richens D; Graham TR; James J; Till H; Turner PG; Featherstone C
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 26319105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does Changing Examiner Stations During UK Postgraduate Surgery Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Influence Examination Reliability and Candidates' Scores?
    Brennan PA; Croke DT; Reed M; Smith L; Munro E; Foulkes J; Arnett R
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 26923102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Academic performance of ethnic minority candidates and discrimination in the MRCGP examinations between 2010 and 2012: analysis of data.
    Esmail A; Roberts C
    BMJ; 2013 Sep; 347():f5662. PubMed ID: 24072882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Stations at Lunchtime During All Day Postgraduate Surgery Examinations Improves Examiner Morale and Stress.
    Brennan PA; Scrimgeour DS; Patel S; Patel R; Griffiths G; Croke DT; Smith L; Arnett R
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):736-747. PubMed ID: 28131800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling.
    McManus IC; Thompson M; Mollon J
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Aug; 6():42. PubMed ID: 16919156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance in the MRCP(UK) Examination 2003-4: analysis of pass rates of UK graduates in relation to self-declared ethnicity and gender.
    Dewhurst NG; McManus C; Mollon J; Dacre JE; Vale AJ
    BMC Med; 2007 May; 5():8. PubMed ID: 17477862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can we predict which residents are going to pass/fail the oral boards?
    Maker VK; Zahedi MM; Villines D; Maker AV
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(6):705-13. PubMed ID: 23111034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting academic performance in surgical training.
    Yost MJ; Gardner J; Bell RM; Fann SA; Lisk JR; ; Cheadle WG; Goldman MH; Rawn S; Weigelt JA; Termuhlen PM; Woods RJ; Endean ED; Kimbrough J; Hulme M
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(3):491-9. PubMed ID: 25600356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is There Gender Bias on the American Board of Surgery General Surgery Certifying Examination?
    Ong TQ; Kopp JP; Jones AT; Malangoni MA
    J Surg Res; 2019 May; 237():131-135. PubMed ID: 30917895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance in the FRCR (UK) Part 2B examination: analysis of factors associated with success.
    Hawtin KE; Williams HR; McKnight L; Booth TC
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Jul; 69(7):750-7. PubMed ID: 24854028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating possible ethnicity and sex bias in clinical examiners: an analysis of data from the MRCP(UK) PACES and nPACES examinations.
    McManus IC; Elder AT; Dacre J
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Jul; 13():103. PubMed ID: 23899223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of success at UK Specialty Board Examinations using the mandatory postgraduate UK surgical examination.
    Scrimgeour DSG; Cleland J; Lee AJ; Brennan PA
    BJS Open; 2019 Dec; 3(6):865-871. PubMed ID: 31832594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The remedial year in the general surgery board certification process: how effective is it?
    Rehm CG; Rowland PA
    Curr Surg; 2005; 62(6):644-9, discussion 649-50. PubMed ID: 16293502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is There Evidence of Gender Bias in the Oral Examination for Initial Certification by the American Board of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation?
    Driscoll SW; Robinson LR; Raddatz MM; Kinney CL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 98(6):512-515. PubMed ID: 30614831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of mock oral examinations in a multi-institutional consortium for board certification in general surgery training.
    Subhas G; Yoo S; Chang YJ; Peiper D; Frikker MJ; Bouwman DL; Silbergleit A; Lloyd LR; Mittal VK
    Am Surg; 2009 Sep; 75(9):817-21. PubMed ID: 19774954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experience with the United Kingdom examinations in neurosurgery.
    Pickard JD
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1997; 69():93-7. PubMed ID: 9253451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FRCS first pass variance: deanery and specialty contrariety.
    Brown C; Abdelrahman T; Pollitt J; Holt M; Lewis WG
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Jan; 94(1107):48-52. PubMed ID: 28790151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRCGP CSA: are the examiners biased, favouring their own by sex, ethnicity, and degree source?
    Denney ML; Freeman A; Wakeford R
    Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Nov; 63(616):e718-25. PubMed ID: 24267854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do medical student's surgical examination scores correlate with performance markers?
    George AB; Schuster A; Helmer SD; Drake RM; Silkey B; Cusick TE; Osland JS; Ammar AD
    Am J Surg; 2014 Dec; 208(6):1040-6; discussion 1045-6. PubMed ID: 25307608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners. Part I Examination by men and women of different race and ethnicity.
    Dawson B; Iwamoto CK; Ross LP; Nungester RJ; Swanson DB; Volle RL
    JAMA; 1994 Sep; 272(9):674-9. PubMed ID: 7710487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.