BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26319108)

  • 1. Assessment of Web-Based Consumer Reviews as a Resource for Drug Performance.
    Adusumalli S; Lee H; Hoi Q; Koo SL; Tan IB; Ng PC
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Aug; 17(8):e211. PubMed ID: 26319108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can online consumers contribute to drug knowledge? A mixed-methods comparison of consumer-generated and professionally controlled psychotropic medication information on the internet.
    Hughes S; Cohen D
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Jul; 13(3):e53. PubMed ID: 21807607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
    Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
    Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.
    Hao H; Zhang K
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 May; 18(5):e108. PubMed ID: 27165558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
    Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Holliday AM; Kachalia A; Meyer GS; Sequist TD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jun; 32(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 28150098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.
    Bardach NS; Hibbard JH; Greaves F; Dudley RA
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e102. PubMed ID: 25934100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument.
    Emmert M; Meier F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study.
    Yan Q; Jensen KJ; Thomas R; Field AR; Jiang Z; Goei C; Davies MG
    JMIR Cardio; 2021 Feb; 5(1):e22975. PubMed ID: 33625359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.
    Okike K; Uhr NR; Shin SYM; Xie KC; Kim CY; Funahashi TT; Kanter MH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 31531811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health Advice from Internet Discussion Forums: How Bad Is Dangerous?
    Cole J; Watkins C; Kleine D
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jan; 18(1):e4. PubMed ID: 26740148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
    Gao GG; McCullough JS; Agarwal R; Jha AK
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):e38. PubMed ID: 22366336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?
    Rothenfluh F; Germeni E; Schulz PJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jun; 18(6):e129. PubMed ID: 27311623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Voice of Drug Consumers: Online Textual Review Analysis Using Structural Topic Model.
    He L; Han D; Zhou X; Qu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 32455918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adverse Events Due to Insomnia Drugs Reported in a Regulatory Database and Online Patient Reviews: Comparative Study.
    Borchert JS; Wang B; Ramzanali M; Stein AB; Malaiyandi LM; Dineley KE
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Nov; 21(11):e13371. PubMed ID: 31702558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.