These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26319108)

  • 21. Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study.
    Liu JJ; Matelski JJ; Bell CM
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e76. PubMed ID: 29514775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An online review of plastic surgeons in southern California.
    Lewis P; Kobayashi E; Gupta S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 May; 74 Suppl 1():S66-70. PubMed ID: 25875912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons?
    Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What do patients say about emergency departments in online reviews? A qualitative study.
    Kilaru AS; Meisel ZF; Paciotti B; Ha YP; Smith RJ; Ranard BL; Merchant RM
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Jan; 25(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 26208538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Dermatologist Ratings on Health Care-Specific and General Consumer Websites.
    Waqas B; Cooley V; Lipner SR
    Cutis; 2021 Apr; 107(4):182-184. PubMed ID: 34096845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Online reviews of 500 urologists.
    Ellimoottil C; Hart A; Greco K; Quek ML; Farooq A
    J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2269-73. PubMed ID: 23228385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website.
    Emmert M; McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e24229. PubMed ID: 34309579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Website quality indicators for consumers.
    Griffiths KM; Christensen H
    J Med Internet Res; 2005 Nov; 7(5):e55. PubMed ID: 16403719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England.
    Patel S; Cain R; Neailey K; Hooberman L
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jul; 20(7):e243. PubMed ID: 30045831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Healthcare @ the speed of thought.
    Cochrane JD
    Integr Healthc Rep; 1999 May; ():1-14, 16-7. PubMed ID: 10557655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Han X; Li B; Zhang T; Qu J
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e14417. PubMed ID: 32496198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
    Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?
    Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Barker GP; Rush AJ; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 30497169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Sander U
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e254. PubMed ID: 27644135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences in Online Consumer Ratings of Health Care Providers Across Medical, Surgical, and Allied Health Specialties: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers.
    Daskivich T; Luu M; Noah B; Fuller G; Anger J; Spiegel B
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e176. PubMed ID: 29743150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Internal Patient Satisfaction Scores at a Cancer Center With Star Ratings on Online Physician-Rating Websites.
    Kim C; Chisholm G; Bevolo A; Shelton B; Kian L; Lewis CM; Garcia EA; Weber RS; Frumovitz M
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1181-e1188. PubMed ID: 33760627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Responding rapidly to FDA drug withdrawals: design and application of a new approach for a consumer health website.
    Embi PJ; Acharya P; McCuistion M; Kishman CP; Haag D; Marine S
    J Med Internet Res; 2006 Sep; 8(3):e16. PubMed ID: 17032632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of Dermatology Practice Online Reviews: Lessons From Qualitative Analysis.
    Smith RJ; Lipoff JB
    JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Feb; 152(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 26606326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality of online pharmacies and websites selling prescription drugs: a systematic review.
    Orizio G; Merla A; Schulz PJ; Gelatti U
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e74. PubMed ID: 21965220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.