209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26320468)
1. Accuracy of Combined Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid and Cervical Cytology Testing as a Primary Screening Tool for Cervical Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chanthavilay P; Mayxay M; Phongsavan K; Marsden DE; White LJ; Moore L; Reinharz D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(14):5889-97. PubMed ID: 26320468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.
Koliopoulos G; Nyaga VN; Santesso N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Paraskevaidis E; Arbyn M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD008587. PubMed ID: 28796882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of alternative strategies for primary cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
Fokom-Domgue J; Combescure C; Fokom-Defo V; Tebeu PM; Vassilakos P; Kengne AP; Petignat P
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3084. PubMed ID: 26142020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.
Arbyn M; Roelens J; Simoens C; Buntinx F; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PP; Prendiville WJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008054. PubMed ID: 23543559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Genomic Amplification of Human Telomerase Gene and C-MYC in Liquid-Based Cytological Specimens Be Used as a Method for Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening?
Gao K; Eurasian M; Zhang J; Wei Y; Zheng Q; Ye H; Li L
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 25832290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A study of cervical cancer screening algorithms].
Zhao FH; Zhang WH; Pan QJ; Zhang X; Chen W; Liu B; Ma JF; Hu SY; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 32(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 20819481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pooled analysis of a self-sampling HPV DNA Test as a cervical cancer primary screening method.
Zhao FH; Lewkowitz AK; Chen F; Lin MJ; Hu SY; Zhang X; Pan QJ; Ma JF; Niyazi M; Li CQ; Li SM; Smith JS; Belinson JL; Qiao YL; Castle PE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Feb; 104(3):178-88. PubMed ID: 22271765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].
Ronco G; Confortini M; Maccallini V; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. PubMed ID: 23139163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of careHPV, Cervista Human Papillomavirus, and Hybrid Capture 2 Methods in Diagnosing Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2+ in Xinjiang Uyghur Women.
Tuerxun G; Yukesaier A; Lu L; Aierken K; Mijiti P; Jiang Y; Abulizi A; Zhang Y; Abuduxikuer G; Abulizi G; Li H
Oncologist; 2016 Jul; 21(7):825-31. PubMed ID: 27317575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening of cervical neoplasia in HIV-infected women in India.
Joshi S; Sankaranarayanan R; Muwonge R; Kulkarni V; Somanathan T; Divate U
AIDS; 2013 Feb; 27(4):607-15. PubMed ID: 23079814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pre- and post-menopausal Thai women with minor cervical cytological abnormalities.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(6):2327-31. PubMed ID: 25824759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies.
Koliopoulos G; Arbyn M; Martin-Hirsch P; Kyrgiou M; Prendiville W; Paraskevaidis E
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan; 104(1):232-46. PubMed ID: 17084886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Real-world research on cervical cancer screening program and effect evaluation for Chinese population].
Zhao YQ; Dai Y; Dang L; Kong LH; Zhang Y; Feng RM; Qiao YL; Lang JH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 40(10):764-771. PubMed ID: 30392341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting.
Poljak M; Oštrbenk A; Seme K; Šterbenc A; Jančar N; Vrtačnik Bokal E
J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S29-S39. PubMed ID: 26643051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India.
Arbyn M; Sankaranarayanan R; Muwonge R; Keita N; Dolo A; Mbalawa CG; Nouhou H; Sakande B; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Sharma A; Shastri S; Basu P
Int J Cancer; 2008 Jul; 123(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 18404671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
