BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26320728)

  • 1. Assessing real-time performances of N95 respirators for health care workers by simulated workplace protection factors.
    Kim H; Baek JE; Seo HK; Lee JE; Myong JP; Lee SJ; Lee JH
    Ind Health; 2015; 53(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 26320728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
    Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Respirator Performance against Nanoparticles under Simulated Workplace Activities.
    Vo E; Zhuang Z; Horvatin M; Liu Y; He X; Rengasamy S
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Oct; 59(8):1012-21. PubMed ID: 26180261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
    Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time fit of a respirator during simulated health care tasks.
    Hauge J; Roe M; Brosseau LM; Colton C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(10):563-71. PubMed ID: 22924959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are quantitative fit factors predictive of respirator fit during simulated healthcare activities?
    Sietsema M; Brosseau LM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Dec; 15(12):803-809. PubMed ID: 30142034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A technique to measure respirator protection factors against aerosol particles in simulated workplace settings using portable instruments.
    Vo E; Horvatin M; Bergman M; Wu B; Zhuang Z
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2020 May; 17(5):231-242. PubMed ID: 32243774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of subject characteristics and respirator features on respirator fit.
    Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Ann RB
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Dec; 2(12):641-9. PubMed ID: 16298949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study of environmental factors affecting nurses' comfort and protection in wearing N95 respirators during bedside procedures.
    Or PP; Chung JW; Wong TK
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Apr; 27(7-8):e1477-e1484. PubMed ID: 29322580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.
    Hon CY; Danyluk Q; Bryce E; Janssen B; Neudorf M; Yassi A; Shen H; Astrakianakis G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Mar; 14(3):175-179. PubMed ID: 27717300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total inward leakage measurement of particulates for N95 filtering facepiece respirators--a comparison study.
    Rengasamy S; Walbert GF; Newcomb WE; Faulkner K; Rengasamy MM; Brannen JJ; Szalajda JV
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):206-16. PubMed ID: 24107745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect on Fit of Multiple Consecutive Donning and Doffing of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.
    Vuma CD; Manganyi J; Wilson K; Rees D
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Oct; 63(8):930-936. PubMed ID: 31504129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Respirator-fit testing: does it ensure the protection of healthcare workers against respirable particles carrying pathogens?
    Lee MC; Takaya S; Long R; Joffe AM
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1149-56. PubMed ID: 18980503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Errors associated with three methods of assessing respirator fit.
    Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Duling MG; Campbell DL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Jan; 3(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 16485349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel approach to fit testing the N95 respirator in real time in a clinical setting.
    Or P; Chung J; Wong T
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2016 Feb; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 24828795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a large-scale quantitative respirator-fit testing program for healthcare workers: survey results.
    Wilkinson IJ; Pisaniello D; Ahmad J; Edwards S
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 31(9):918-25. PubMed ID: 20658919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulated workplace protection factor study of powered air-purifying and supplied air respirators.
    Cohen HJ; Hecker LH; Mattheis DK; Johnson JS; Biermann AH; Foote KL
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(5):595-604. PubMed ID: 11669385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.