413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26321172)
1. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches.
Martino MA; Berger EA; McFetridge JT; Shubella J; Gosciniak G; Wejkszner T; Kainz GF; Patriarco J; Thomas MB; Boulay R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 24513969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.
Gungor M; Kahraman K; Dursun P; Ozbasli E; Genim C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28429119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G
J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.
Eddib A; Jain N; Aalto M; Hughes S; Eswar A; Erk M; Michalik C; Krovi V; Singhal P
J Robot Surg; 2013 Sep; 7(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 27000926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of Overnight Admission after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in the Expert Setting.
Moawad G; Tyan P; Vargas V; Park D; Young H; Marfori C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 29723642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning curve analysis of intracorporeal cuff suturing during robotic single-site total hysterectomy.
Akdemir A; Zeybek B; Ozgurel B; Oztekin MK; Sendag F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 24952342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
