These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2632158)

  • 1. [Critique and results of the hip prosthesis with an external cortical femoral support. Apropos of Y. Cirotteau's paper. June 28, 1989 meeting].
    Barbin JY
    Chirurgie; 1989; 115(7):476-9. PubMed ID: 2632158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of a physiological hip prosthesis: evaluation of the strains after implantation of a prototype of hip implant: experiment in a dry femur.
    Vander Sloten J; Labey L; Van Audekercke R; Van der Perre G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1993; 3(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8490530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of femoral stem cross-sectional geometry on cement stresses in total hip reconstruction.
    Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Johnston RC; Milroy JC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (146):71-7. PubMed ID: 7371271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theoretical and experimental studies of femoral stresses following surface replacement hip arthroplasty.
    Shybut GT; Askew MJ; Hori RY; Stulberg SD
    Proc Inst Med Chic; 1980; 33(3):95-106. PubMed ID: 7433457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The stress in femoral prosthesis: a study of the importance of the diaphyseal support and horizontal setting (author's transl)].
    Lord G; Marotte JH; Blanchard JP; Guillamon JL; Bancel P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1980; 66(3):141-56. PubMed ID: 6450977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A standardized finite element model for routine comparative evaluations of femoral hip prostheses.
    Huiskes R; Vroemen W
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1986; 52(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 3788510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical simulator for the upper femur.
    Munting E; Verhelpen M
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 8372646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.
    Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of an animal model for implant fixation studies: anatomical aspects.
    Goel VK; Drinker H; Panjabi MM; Strongwater A
    Yale J Biol Med; 1982; 55(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 7136007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Otto Aufranc Award Paper. An analysis of femoral prosthesis design: the effects on proximal femur loading.
    Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Johnston RC; Pedersen DR
    Hip; 1981; ():111-22. PubMed ID: 7333883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of human and canine external femoral morphologies in the context of total hip replacement.
    Bloebaum RD; Ota DT; Skedros JG; Mantas JP
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Sep; 27(9):1149-59. PubMed ID: 8126013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision total hip arthroplasty in the deficient femur with a proximal load-bearing prosthesis.
    Head WC; Wagner RA; Emerson RH; Malinin TI
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):119-26. PubMed ID: 8118966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The anatomic basis of femoral component design.
    Noble PC; Alexander JW; Lindahl LJ; Yew DT; Granberry WM; Tullos HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):148-65. PubMed ID: 3416522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strategies for improving fixation of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty.
    Poss R; Walker P; Spector M; Reilly DT; Robertson DD; Sledge CB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):181-94. PubMed ID: 3416525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analytical considerations of the mechanical stem-femur coupling.
    Barberi G; Gola M; Gugliotta A; Calderale PM
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1980; 46(6):728-34. PubMed ID: 7246110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality assurance in hip prosthesis surgery. New type hip prostheses, review of a 3-year material].
    Mohr E; Indrekvam K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1996 Mar; 116(7):846-8. PubMed ID: 8644097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in-vitro investigation of the CPS-Plus femoral stem: influence of the proximal centraliser on cement pressurisation during stem insertion.
    Gozzard C; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW; Learmonth ID
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Apr; 74(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 12807321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femoral cement removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. A biomechanical analysis.
    Dennis DA; Dingman CA; Meglan DA; O'Leary JF; Mallory TH; Berme N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Jul; (220):142-7. PubMed ID: 3594984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Extensometry and primary anchorage of femur implants. Study of the upper metaphyseal intracortical support of the B.P.R cement-less implant].
    Delecrin J; Passuti N; Royer J; Rogez JM; Bainvel JV
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1989; 55(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 2801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.