These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26322683)

  • 1. A Bayesian equivalency test for two independent binomial proportions.
    Kawasaki Y; Shimokawa A; Yamada H; Miyaoka E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(4):781-9. PubMed ID: 26322683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian non-inferiority test for two independent binomial proportions.
    Kawasaki Y; Miyaoka E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 23625633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inference of equivalence for the ratio of two normal means with unspecified variances.
    Xu S; Hua SY; Menton R; Barker K; Menon S; D'Agostino RB
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1264-79. PubMed ID: 25033269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials.
    Daimon T
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 18201944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint equivalence of means and variances of two populations.
    Grieve AP
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Jul; 8(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 9741854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian inference of P(π1 > π2) for two proportions.
    Kawasaki Y; Miyaoka E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(3):425-37. PubMed ID: 22416833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian predictive approach for inference about proportions.
    Lecoutre B; Derzko G; Grouin JM
    Stat Med; 1995 May 15-30; 14(9-10):1057-63; discussion 1064. PubMed ID: 7569500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian noninferiority test for 2 binomial probabilities as the extension of Fisher exact test.
    Doi M; Takahashi F; Kawasaki Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(30):4789-4803. PubMed ID: 28960376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample sizes for event rate equivalence trials using prior information.
    Gould AL
    Stat Med; 1993 Nov; 12(21):2009-23. PubMed ID: 8296111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inherent difficulties with active control equivalence studies.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(24):2367-75. PubMed ID: 8134739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian approach to bioequivalence for the 2 x 2 changeover design.
    Selwyn MR; Dempster AP; Hall NR
    Biometrics; 1981 Mar; 37(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 7018605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of tests and sample size formulae for proving therapeutic equivalence based on the difference of binomial probabilities.
    Roebruck P; Kühn A
    Stat Med; 1995 Jul; 14(14):1583-94. PubMed ID: 7481195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian modeling of multivariate average bioequivalence.
    Ghosh P; Gönen M
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2402-19. PubMed ID: 18095275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian analysis for proportions with an independent background effect.
    Bi J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):71-83. PubMed ID: 17535580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayes factors for superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence designs.
    van Ravenzwaaij D; Monden R; Tendeiro JN; Ioannidis JPA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 30925900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-sided hypothesis testing: simultaneous testing of superiority, equivalence and inferiority.
    Goeman JJ; Solari A; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2117-25. PubMed ID: 20658478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The conditional binomial test revisited for clinical trials.
    Lei X; Davis D; Kuan L; Lee J; Oh S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Nov; 8(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 9855032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving and extending the McNemar test using the Bayesian method.
    Ogura T; Yanagimoto T
    Stat Med; 2016 Jun; 35(14):2455-66. PubMed ID: 26783041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian sample size calculation for estimation of the difference between two binomial proportions.
    Pezeshk H; Nematollahi N; Maroufy V; Marriott P; Gittins J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2013 Dec; 22(6):598-611. PubMed ID: 21436190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian approach to bioequivalence assessment: an example.
    Fluehler H; Grieve AP; Mandallaz D; Mau J; Moser HA
    J Pharm Sci; 1983 Oct; 72(10):1178-81. PubMed ID: 6644568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.