These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26322684)

  • 1. Cross-sensory mapping of feature values in the size-brightness correspondence can be more relative than absolute.
    Walker L; Walker P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):138-50. PubMed ID: 26322684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The size-brightness correspondence: evidence for crosstalk among aligned conceptual feature dimensions.
    Walker P; Walker L; Francis B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2694-710. PubMed ID: 26294420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-sensory correspondences and symbolism in spoken and written language.
    Walker P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1339-61. PubMed ID: 26913934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heaviness-brightness correspondence and stimulus-response compatibility.
    Walker P; Scallon G; Francis BJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1949-1970. PubMed ID: 31898071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size-brightness correspondence: crosstalk and congruity among dimensions of connotative meaning.
    Walker P; Walker L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1226-40. PubMed ID: 22484796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Del Gatto C; Spence C; Santangelo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):527-534. PubMed ID: 29116614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright.
    Walker P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1792-809. PubMed ID: 22833281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Questioning the automaticity of audiovisual correspondences.
    Getz LM; Kubovy M
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():101-108. PubMed ID: 29486377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Context-dependent brightness priming occurs without visual awareness.
    Persuh M; Ro T
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Mar; 21(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 22138371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond colour perception: auditory-visual synaesthesia induces experiences of geometric objects in specific locations.
    Chiou R; Stelter M; Rich AN
    Cortex; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1750-63. PubMed ID: 22673231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It does belong together: cross-modal correspondences influence cross-modal integration during perceptual learning.
    Brunel L; Carvalho PF; Goldstone RL
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():358. PubMed ID: 25914653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The sound of size: crossmodal binding in pitch-size synesthesia: a combined TMS, EEG and psychophysics study.
    Bien N; ten Oever S; Goebel R; Sack AT
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):663-72. PubMed ID: 21787871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-Sensory Correspondences: Heaviness is Dark and Low-Pitched.
    Walker P; Scallon G; Francis B
    Perception; 2017 Jul; 46(7):772-792. PubMed ID: 28622755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual mismatch negativity in the "optimal" multi-feature paradigm.
    Shi L; Wu J; Sun G; Dang L; Zhao L
    J Integr Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 12(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 23869864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain.
    Diaconescu AO; Alain C; McIntosh AR
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 106(6):2896-909. PubMed ID: 21880944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sound symbolism in infancy: evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds.
    Ozturk O; Krehm M; Vouloumanos A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Feb; 114(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 22960203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Newborns are sensitive to the correspondence between auditory pitch and visuospatial elevation.
    Walker P; Bremner JG; Lunghi M; Dolscheid S; D Barba B; Simion F
    Dev Psychobiol; 2018 Mar; 60(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 29355921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains.
    Walker L; Walker P; Francis B
    Perception; 2012; 41(10):1186-92. PubMed ID: 23469700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.