These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26322691)

  • 1. Pointing and antipointing in Müller-Lyer figures: Why illusion effects need to be scaled.
    Hesse C; Franz VH; Schenk T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 26322691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delayed pointing movements to masked Müller-Lyer figures are affected by target size but not the illusion.
    de Wit M; van der Kamp J; Masters RS
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1903-9. PubMed ID: 21420989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related differences in a delayed pointing of a Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Rival C; Olivier I; Ceyte H; Ferrel C
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 153(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 14513301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Keeping a target in memory does not increase the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades.
    de Brouwer AJ; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):977-83. PubMed ID: 26686530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
    Bruno N; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1421-33. PubMed ID: 19059422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.
    Franz VH; Hesse C; Kollath S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1518-31. PubMed ID: 18834894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements.
    Meegan DV; Glazebrook CM; Dhillon VP; Tremblay L; Welsh TN; Elliott D
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 155(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 15064883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.
    Predebon J
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 May; 163(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 15654590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time course of the effect of the Muller-Lyer illusion on saccades and perceptual judgments.
    de Brouwer AJ; Brenner E; Medendorp WP; Smeets JB
    J Vis; 2014 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 24396047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual illusion and action.
    Gentilucci M; Chieffi S; Deprati E; Saetti MC; Toni I
    Neuropsychologia; 1996 May; 34(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 9148193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space.
    Bernardis P; Knox P; Bruno N
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 15791463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.
    Westwood DA; McEachern T; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 11713628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.
    Glover S; Dixon P
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Feb; 154(4):504-12. PubMed ID: 14579006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visually guided pointing, the Müller-Lyer illusion, and the functional interpretation of the dorsal-ventral split: conclusions from 33 independent studies.
    Bruno N; Bernardis P; Gentilucci M
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2008; 32(3):423-37. PubMed ID: 17976722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Müller-Lyer illusion: investigation of a center of gravity effect on the amplitudes of saccades.
    Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP
    J Vis; 2010 Jan; 10(1):11.1-13. PubMed ID: 20143904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptation effects in grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Kopiske KK; Cesanek E; Campagnoli C; Domini F
    Vision Res; 2017 Jul; 136():21-31. PubMed ID: 28571701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual feedback explains why propointing is better than antipointing in spatial neglect.
    Utz KS; Hesse C; Hintz A; Grüneberger D; Kulke H; Roth I; Klos T; Kromichal V; Melms A; Schupp W; Kohl D; Schenk T
    Cortex; 2018 Jan; 98():114-127. PubMed ID: 28648411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When does action resist visual illusion? The effect of Müller-Lyer stimuli on reflexive and voluntary saccades.
    Knox PC; Bruno N
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 17372725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Heath M; Rival C; Binsted G
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 15278330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.