These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2632350)

  • 1. Likelihood estimation of quantitative genetic parameters when selection occurs: models and problems.
    Gianola D; Fernando RL; Im S; Foulley JL
    Genome; 1989; 31(2):768-77. PubMed ID: 2632350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dominance genetic variance for traits under directional selection in Drosophila serrata.
    Sztepanacz JL; Blows MW
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):371-84. PubMed ID: 25783700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of identity-by-descent and identity-by-state matrices that are used for genetic evaluation and estimation of variance components.
    Fernando RL; Cheng H; Sun X; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):213-223. PubMed ID: 28508481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reparametrization-based estimation of genetic parameters in multi-trait animal model using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation.
    Mathew B; Holand AM; Koistinen P; Léon J; Sillanpää MJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2016 Feb; 129(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 26582509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variance of gametic diversity and its application in selection programs.
    Santos DJA; Cole JB; Lawlor TJ; VanRaden PM; Tonhati H; Ma L
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jun; 102(6):5279-5294. PubMed ID: 30981488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sire evaluation for multiple binary responses when information is missing on some traits.
    Foulley JL; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 1986 Oct; 69(10):2681-95. PubMed ID: 3805449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle.
    Neuner S; Emmerling R; Thaller G; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4344-54. PubMed ID: 18946140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A maximum likelihood approach to the detection of selection from a phylogeny.
    Golding B; Felsenstein J
    J Mol Evol; 1990 Dec; 31(6):511-23. PubMed ID: 2176699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters.
    Thompson R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Mar; 275(1635):679-86. PubMed ID: 18211869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Up hill, down dale: quantitative genetics of curvaceous traits.
    Meyer K; Kirkpatrick M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Jul; 360(1459):1443-55. PubMed ID: 16048787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliable computing in estimation of variance components.
    Misztal I
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Dec; 125(6):363-70. PubMed ID: 19134071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential transformation for multiple traits for estimation of (co)variance components with a derivative-free algorithm for restricted maximum likelihood.
    Van Vleck LD; Boldman KG
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Apr; 71(4):836-44. PubMed ID: 8478285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selection during a selfing programme. I. The effects of a single round of selection.
    Cornish MA
    Heredity (Edinb); 1990 Oct; 65 ( Pt 2)():201-11. PubMed ID: 2272849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of additive genetic variance when base populations are selected.
    van der Werf JH; de Boer IJ
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Oct; 68(10):3124-32. PubMed ID: 2254191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting response to selection on a quantitative trait: a comparison between models for mixed-mating populations.
    Kelly JK; Williamson S
    J Theor Biol; 2000 Nov; 207(1):37-56. PubMed ID: 11027478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of bivariate and multivariate joint analyses on the selection loss of beef cattle.
    Pedrosa VB; Groeneveld E; Eler JP; Ferraz JB
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 May; 13(2):4036-45. PubMed ID: 24938697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic Gain Increases by Applying the Usefulness Criterion with Improved Variance Prediction in Selection of Crosses.
    Lehermeier C; Teyssèdre S; Schön CC
    Genetics; 2017 Dec; 207(4):1651-1661. PubMed ID: 29038144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.