These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26323610)

  • 1. Accuracy, Efficiency, and Inappropriate Actions Using JumpSTART Triage in MCI Simulations.
    Claudius I; Kaji AH; Santillanes G; Cicero MX; Donofrio JJ; Gausche-Hill M; Srinivasan S; Chang TP
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2015 Oct; 30(5):457-60. PubMed ID: 26323610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Computerized Patients versus Live Moulaged Actors for a Mass-casualty Drill.
    Claudius I; Kaji A; Santillanes G; Cicero M; Donofrio JJ; Gausche-Hill M; Srinivasan S; Chang TP
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2015 Oct; 30(5):438-42. PubMed ID: 26265451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized trial comparing two mass casualty triage systems (JumpSTART versus SALT) in a pediatric simulated mass casualty event.
    Jones N; White ML; Tofil N; Pickens M; Youngblood A; Zinkan L; Baker MD
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 24601857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First Responder Accuracy Using SALT during Mass-casualty Incident Simulation.
    Lee CW; McLeod SL; Van Aarsen K; Klingel M; Franc JM; Peddle MB
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2016 Apr; 31(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 26857296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Electronic Versus Manual Mass-Casualty Incident Triage.
    Bolduc C; Maghraby N; Fok P; Luong TM; Homier V
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2018 Jun; 33(3):273-278. PubMed ID: 29661267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of a Two-step Emergency Department Triage Model with START, then CTAS, on Patient Flow During a Simulated Mass-casualty Incident.
    Lee JS; Franc JM
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2015 Aug; 30(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 26105567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A modified simple triage and rapid treatment algorithm from the New York City (USA) Fire Department.
    Arshad FH; Williams A; Asaeda G; Isaacs D; Kaufman B; Ben-Eli D; Gonzalez D; Freese JP; Hillgardner J; Weakley J; Hall CB; Webber MP; Prezant DJ
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2015 Apr; 30(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 25687598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Virtual reality and live simulation: a comparison between two simulation tools for assessing mass casualty triage skills.
    Luigi Ingrassia P; Ragazzoni L; Carenzo L; Colombo D; Ripoll Gallardo A; Della Corte F
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2015 Apr; 22(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 24841770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the Accuracy of Three Pediatric Disaster Triage Strategies: A Simulation-Based Investigation.
    Cicero MX; Overly F; Brown L; Yarzebski J; Walsh B; Shabanova V; Auerbach M; Riera A; Adelgais K; Meckler G; Cone DC; Baum CR
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2016 Apr; 10(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 26744228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A pilot study examining the speed and accuracy of triage for simulated disaster patients in an emergency department setting: Comparison of a computerized version of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) and Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) methods.
    Curran-Sills G; Franc JM
    CJEM; 2017 Sep; 19(5):364-371. PubMed ID: 27788698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of SALT triage in a simulated mass-casualty incident.
    Lerner EB; Schwartz RB; Coule PL; Pirrallo RG
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2010; 14(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19947863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a Pediatric Mass Casualty Triage Algorithm Validation Tool.
    Donofrio JJ; Kaji AH; Claudius IA; Chang TP; Santillanes G; Cicero MX; Srinivasan S; Perez-Rogers A; Gausche-Hill M
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2016; 20(3):343-53. PubMed ID: 26808000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pilot test of the SALT mass casualty triage system.
    Cone DC; Serra J; Burns K; MacMillan DS; Kurland L; Van Gelder C
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2009; 13(4):536-40. PubMed ID: 19731169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-Rater Reliability and Agreement Among Mass-Casualty Incident Algorithms Using a Pediatric Trauma Dataset: A Pilot Study.
    Fisher EH; Claudius I; Kaji AH; Shaban A; McGlynn N; Cicero MX; Santillanes G; Gausche-Hill M; Chang TP; Donofrio-Odmann JJ
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2022 Jun; 37(3):306-313. PubMed ID: 35441588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology-Assisted Triage versus Standard Practice in Triaging Casualties by Paramedic Students in a Mass-Casualty Incident Scenario.
    Jain T; Sibley A; Stryhn H; Hubloue I
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2018 Aug; 33(4):375-380. PubMed ID: 30001765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Triage performance of first-year medical students using a multiple-casualty scenario, paper exercise.
    Sapp RF; Brice JH; Myers JB; Hinchey P
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2010; 25(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 20586018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the Accuracy of Mass Casualty Triage Systems in a Pediatric Population.
    Heffernan RW; Lerner EB; McKee CH; Browne LR; Colella MR; Liu JM; Schwartz RB
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2019; 23(3):304-308. PubMed ID: 30196737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of START and SALT triage methodologies to reference standard definitions and to a field mass casualty simulation.
    Silvestri S; Field A; Mangalat N; Weatherford T; Hunter C; McGowan Z; Stamile Z; Mattox T; Barfield T; Afshari A; Ralls G; Papa L
    Am J Disaster Med; 2017; 12(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 28822212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Triage Performance of School Personnel Using the SALT System.
    Celik DH; Mencl FR; Debacker M; Kurland L; Wilber ST; Frey JA
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2019 Aug; 34(4):401-406. PubMed ID: 31389327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Simple Graphical Method for Quantification of Disaster Management Surge Capacity Using Computer Simulation and Process-control Tools.
    Franc JM; Ingrassia PL; Verde M; Colombo D; Della Corte F
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2015 Feb; 30(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 25407409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.