These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26324093)

  • 21. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.
    Meltzer JA; Constable RT
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 15627581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the transfer of prior tests or study events to subsequent study.
    Storm BC; Friedman MC; Murayama K; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 23978234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Production does not improve memory for face-name associations.
    Hourihan KL; Smith AR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 27244356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learning in the absence of overt practice: a novel (previously unseen) stimulus can trigger retrieval of an unpracticed response.
    Longman CS; Kiesel A; Verbruggen F
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jun; 84(4):1065-1083. PubMed ID: 30415378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attempting to answer a meaningful question enhances subsequent learning even when feedback is delayed.
    Kornell N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 23855547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1547-52. PubMed ID: 21707217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Parietal lesion effects on cued recall following pair associate learning.
    Ben-Zvi S; Soroker N; Levy DA
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 73():176-94. PubMed ID: 25998492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting transfer performance: a comparison of competing function learning models.
    McDaniel MA; Dimperio E; Griego JA; Busemeyer JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):173-95. PubMed ID: 19210089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Testing promotes long-term learning via stabilizing activation patterns in a large network of brain areas.
    Keresztes A; Kaiser D; Kovács G; Racsmány M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Nov; 24(11):3025-35. PubMed ID: 23796945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.
    Smith TA; Kimball DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Induction of a memory retrieval strategy by young children.
    Ackerman BP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Jul; 62(2):243-71. PubMed ID: 8683188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Errorful and errorless learning: The impact of cue-target constraint in learning from errors.
    Bridger EK; Mecklinger A
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):898-911. PubMed ID: 24615717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect.
    Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti N; Deluca J
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 20230121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information.
    Finn B; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1665-81. PubMed ID: 23565780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Occasion setting in Pavlovian ambiguous target discriminations.
    Bueno JL; Holland PC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Nov; 79(3):132-47. PubMed ID: 18657599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.