These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26325445)

  • 1. Graph-Based Clustering of Predicted Ligand-Binding Pockets on Protein Surfaces.
    Degac J; Winter U; Helms V
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):1944-52. PubMed ID: 26325445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection.
    Le Guilloux V; Schmidtke P; Tuffery P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 10():168. PubMed ID: 19486540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visualisation of variable binding pockets on protein surfaces by probabilistic analysis of related structure sets.
    Ashford P; Moss DS; Alex A; Yeap SK; Povia A; Nobeli I; Williams MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13():39. PubMed ID: 22417279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.
    Liang J; Edelsbrunner H; Woodward C
    Protein Sci; 1998 Sep; 7(9):1884-97. PubMed ID: 9761470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of pockets on protein surfaces using small and large probe spheres to find putative ligand binding sites.
    Kawabata T; Go N
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):516-29. PubMed ID: 17444522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties.
    Wong GY; Leung FH; Ling SH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 24407309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of multiscale pockets on protein surfaces using mathematical morphology.
    Kawabata T
    Proteins; 2010 Apr; 78(5):1195-211. PubMed ID: 19938154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Large-scale comparison of four binding site detection algorithms.
    Schmidtke P; Souaille C; Estienne F; Baurin N; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2191-200. PubMed ID: 20828173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extraction, quantification and visualization of protein pockets.
    Zhang X; Bajaj C
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2007; 6():275-86. PubMed ID: 17951831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the searching abilities of HBOP and HBSITE for binding pocket detection.
    Oda A; Yamaotsu N; Hirono S
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Dec; 30(16):2728-37. PubMed ID: 19399761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. fpocket: online tools for protein ensemble pocket detection and tracking.
    Schmidtke P; Le Guilloux V; Maupetit J; Tufféry P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Jul; 38(Web Server issue):W582-9. PubMed ID: 20478829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures.
    Glaser F; Morris RJ; Najmanovich RJ; Laskowski RA; Thornton JM
    Proteins; 2006 Feb; 62(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 16304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of the small number of distinct ligand binding pockets in proteins for drug discovery, evolution and biochemical function.
    Skolnick J; Gao M; Roy A; Srinivasan B; Zhou H
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2015 Mar; 25(6):1163-70. PubMed ID: 25690787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cofactor-binding sites in proteins of deviating sequence: comparative analysis and clustering in torsion angle, cavity, and fold space.
    Stegemann B; Klebe G
    Proteins; 2012 Feb; 80(2):626-48. PubMed ID: 22095739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting peptide binding sites on protein surfaces by clustering chemical interactions.
    Yan C; Zou X
    J Comput Chem; 2015 Jan; 36(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 25363279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protein pockets: inventory, shape, and comparison.
    Coleman RG; Sharp KA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):589-603. PubMed ID: 20205445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of protein functional surfaces by the concept of a split pocket.
    Tseng YY; Li WH
    Proteins; 2009 Sep; 76(4):959-76. PubMed ID: 19326458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structure-based computational approaches for small-molecule modulation of protein-protein interactions.
    Xu D; Wang B; Meroueh SO
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1278():77-92. PubMed ID: 25859944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.