These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26327127)

  • 1. Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.
    Rief M; Feger S; Martus P; Laule M; Dewey M; Schönenberger E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136737. PubMed ID: 26327127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient satisfaction with coronary CT angiography, myocardial CT perfusion, myocardial perfusion MRI, SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and conventional coronary angiography.
    Feger S; Rief M; Zimmermann E; Richter F; Roehle R; Dewey M; Schönenberger E
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jul; 25(7):2115-24. PubMed ID: 25764088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography.
    Rief M; Zimmermann E; Stenzel F; Martus P; Stangl K; Greupner J; Knebel F; Kranz A; Schlattmann P; Laule M; Dewey M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1476-85. PubMed ID: 23792193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion by computed tomography in the identification of flow-limiting stenosis - The CORE320 study: An integrated analysis of CT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion.
    Magalhães TA; Kishi S; George RT; Arbab-Zadeh A; Vavere AL; Cox C; Matheson MB; Miller JM; Brinker J; Di Carli M; Rybicki FJ; Rochitte CE; Clouse ME; Lima JA
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 25977111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression.
    Andreini D; Mushtaq S; Pontone G; Conte E; Collet C; Sonck J; D'Errico A; Di Odoardo L; Guglielmo M; Baggiano A; Trabattoni D; Ravagnani P; Montorsi P; Teruzzi G; Olivares P; Fabbiocchi F; De Martini S; Calligaris G; Annoni A; Mancini ME; Formenti A; Magatelli M; Consiglio E; Muscogiuri G; Lombardi F; Fiorentini C; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar; 13(3):732-742. PubMed ID: 31422127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incremental diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over coronary angiography stratified by pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary artery calcification: The CORE320 study.
    Sharma RK; Arbab-Zadeh A; Kishi S; Chen MY; Magalhães TA; George RT; Dewey M; Rybicki FJ; Kofoed KF; de Roos A; Tan SY; Matheson M; Vavere A; Cox C; Clouse ME; Miller JM; Brinker JA; Arai AE; Di Carli MF; Rochitte CE; Lima JA
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 201():570-7. PubMed ID: 26334382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Additional value of dipyridamole stress myocardial perfusion by 64-row computed tomography in patients with coronary stents.
    Magalhães TA; Cury RC; Pereira AC; Moreira Vde M; Lemos PA; Kalil-Filho R; Rochitte CE
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2011; 5(6):449-58. PubMed ID: 22146504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of combined assessment using adenosine stress computed tomography perfusion + computed tomography angiography with transluminal attenuation gradient + computed tomography angiography against invasive fractional flow reserve.
    Wong DT; Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leong DP; Leung MC; Malaiapan Y; Nerlekar N; Crossett M; Troupis J; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 May; 63(18):1904-12. PubMed ID: 24657696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of myocardial CT perfusion in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: comparison with SPECT-myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Feuchtner GM; Plank F; Pena C; Battle J; Min J; Leipsic J; Labounty T; Janowitz W; Katzen B; Ziffer J; Cury RC
    Heart; 2012 Oct; 98(20):1510-7. PubMed ID: 22895647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient acceptance of noninvasive and invasive coronary angiography.
    Schönenberger E; Schnapauff D; Teige F; Laule M; Hamm B; Dewey M
    PLoS One; 2007 Feb; 2(2):e246. PubMed ID: 17327910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Feuchtner G; Goetti R; Plass A; Wieser M; Scheffel H; Wyss C; Stolzmann P; Donati O; Schnabl J; Falk V; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Cury RC
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):540-9. PubMed ID: 21862731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of clinical and acquisition parameters on the interpretability of adenosine stress myocardial computed tomography perfusion.
    van Rosendael AR; de Graaf MA; Dimitriu-Leen AC; van Zwet EW; van den Hoogen IJ; Kharbanda RK; Bax JJ; Kroft LJ; Scholte AJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 18(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 27013247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Cury RC; Magalhães TA; Borges AC; Shiozaki AA; Lemos PA; Júnior JS; Meneghetti JC; Cury RC; Rochitte CE
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 20643238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Wang Y; Qin L; Shi X; Zeng Y; Jing H; Schoepf UJ; Jin Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):521-9. PubMed ID: 22357991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiac CT angiography (CTA) and nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)-a comparison in detecting significant coronary artery disease.
    Budoff MJ; Rasouli ML; Shavelle DM; Gopal A; Gul KM; Mao SS; Liu SH; McKay CR
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 17307657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison.
    Yin WH; Lu B; Li N; Han L; Hou ZH; Wu RZ; Wu YJ; Niu HX; Jiang SL; Krazinski AW; Ebersberger U; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1239-49. PubMed ID: 24269265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients.
    Kim SH; Rübenthaler J; Nörenberg D; Huber T; Kunz WG; Sommer WH; Schoenberg SO; Janssen S; Overhoff D; Froelich MF
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1443-1450. PubMed ID: 32885295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized, multicenter, multivendor study of myocardial perfusion imaging with regadenoson CT perfusion vs single photon emission CT.
    Cury RC; Kitt TM; Feaheny K; Blankstein R; Ghoshhajra BB; Budoff MJ; Leipsic J; Min JK; Akin J; George RT
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(2):103-12.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25726411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.