BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26327624)

  • 1. Acoustic shadows help gleaning bats find prey, but may be defeated by prey acoustic camouflage on rough surfaces.
    Clare EL; Holderied MW
    Elife; 2015 Sep; 4():. PubMed ID: 26327624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bats Actively Use Leaves as Specular Reflectors to Detect Acoustically Camouflaged Prey.
    Geipel I; Steckel J; Tschapka M; Vanderelst D; Schnitzler HU; Kalko EKV; Peremans H; Simon R
    Curr Biol; 2019 Aug; 29(16):2731-2736.e3. PubMed ID: 31378617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptations for Substrate Gleaning in Bats: The Pallid Bat as a Case Study.
    Razak KA
    Brain Behav Evol; 2018; 91(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 29874652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic mirror effect increases prey detection distance in trawling bats.
    Siemers BM; Baur E; Schnitzler HU
    Naturwissenschaften; 2005 Jun; 92(6):272-6. PubMed ID: 15871000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The acoustic advantage of hunting at low heights above water: behavioural experiments on the European 'trawling' bats Myotis capaccinii, M. dasycneme and M. daubentonii.
    Siemers BM; Stilz P; Schnitzler HU
    J Exp Biol; 2001 Nov; 204(Pt 22):3843-54. PubMed ID: 11807102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Echolocating bats prefer a high risk-high gain foraging strategy to increase prey profitability.
    Stidsholt L; Hubancheva A; Greif S; Goerlitz HR; Johnson M; Yovel Y; Madsen PT
    Elife; 2023 Apr; 12():. PubMed ID: 37070239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats.
    Arlettaz R; Jones G; Racey PA
    Nature; 2001 Dec; 414(6865):742-5. PubMed ID: 11742397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic camouflage increases with body size and changes with bat echolocation frequency range in a community of nocturnally active Lepidoptera.
    Simon R; Dreissen A; Leroy H; Berg MP; Halfwerk W
    J Anim Ecol; 2023 Dec; 92(12):2363-2372. PubMed ID: 37882060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefits of insect-swarm hunting to echolocating bats, and its influence on the evolution of bat echolocation signals.
    Boonman A; Fenton B; Yovel Y
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Dec; 15(12):e1006873. PubMed ID: 31830029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach.
    Ratcliffe JM; Fullard JH
    J Exp Biol; 2005 Dec; 208(Pt 24):4689-98. PubMed ID: 16326950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Echolocation and passive listening by foraging mouse-eared bats Myotis myotis and M. blythii.
    Russo D; Jones G; Arlettaz R
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Jan; 210(Pt 1):166-76. PubMed ID: 17170159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vision complements echolocation in an aerial-hawking bat.
    Rydell J; Eklöf J
    Naturwissenschaften; 2003 Oct; 90(10):481-3. PubMed ID: 14564410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optic and echo-acoustic flow interact in bats.
    Kugler K; Luksch H; Peremans H; Vanderelst D; Wiegrebe L; Firzlaff U
    J Exp Biol; 2019 Mar; 222(Pt 6):. PubMed ID: 30728158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coordinated Control of Acoustical Field of View and Flight in Three-Dimensional Space for Consecutive Capture by Echolocating Bats during Natural Foraging.
    Sumiya M; Fujioka E; Motoi K; Kondo M; Hiryu S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169995. PubMed ID: 28085936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of silent and motionless prey on vegetation by echolocation in the gleaning bat Micronycteris microtis.
    Geipel I; Jung K; Kalko EK
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Mar; 280(1754):20122830. PubMed ID: 23325775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bat wing air pressures may deflect prey structures to provide echo cues for detecting prey in clutter.
    Kuc R; Kuc V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1776-9. PubMed ID: 22978904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolutionary escalation: the bat-moth arms race.
    Ter Hofstede HM; Ratcliffe JM
    J Exp Biol; 2016 Jun; 219(Pt 11):1589-602. PubMed ID: 27252453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multimodal cues improve prey localization under complex environmental conditions.
    Rhebergen F; Taylor RC; Ryan MJ; Page RA; Halfwerk W
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Sep; 282(1814):. PubMed ID: 26336176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensory-based niche partitioning in a multiple predator - multiple prey community.
    Falk JJ; ter Hofstede HM; Jones PL; Dixon MM; Faure PA; Kalko EK; Page RA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jun; 282(1808):20150520. PubMed ID: 25994677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensory biology: listening in the dark for echoes from silent and stationary prey.
    Jones G
    Curr Biol; 2013 Mar; 23(6):R249-51. PubMed ID: 23518059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.