BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2632777)

  • 1. [Biological criteria for osseointegration].
    Mongeot M
    J Parodontol; 1989 Feb; 8(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 2632777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Biological success in osseointegrated implants].
    Campos FO; Cifuentes H; Chacón R; Kleinman A
    Rev Dent Chile; 1991 Apr; 82(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 1871394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: their effect on osseointegration. A literature review.
    Sykaras N; Iacopino AM; Marker VA; Triplett RG; Woody RD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):675-90. PubMed ID: 11055135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The choice of alloplastic materials for oral implants: does it really matter?
    Glantz PO
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 9922732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fractal dimension analysis of mandibular bones: toward a morphological compatibility of implants.
    Oshida Y; Hashem A; Nishihara T; Yapchulay MV
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(5):397-407. PubMed ID: 8000293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-lasting osseointegration of immediately loaded, bar-connected TPS screws after 12 years of function: a histologic case report of a 95-year-old patient.
    Ledermann PD; Schenk RK; Buser D
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1998 Dec; 18(6):552-63. PubMed ID: 10321170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Tapered Groovy implant optimizes implant success in suboptimal clinical conditions.
    Hanao G
    Dent Implantol Update; 2006 Jan; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 16422445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone.
    Isidor F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():8-18. PubMed ID: 16968378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants.
    Steflik DE; Noel C; McBrayer C; Lake FT; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 8699510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical properties of bone-implant interface: an in vitro comparison of the parameters at placement and at 3 months.
    Brosh T; Persovski Z; Binderman I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):729-35. PubMed ID: 8530176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
    Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface energy effects of implant biomaterials on the implant-tissue interface: implications for the rate, character and quality of post-surgical healing.
    Dorfman JD
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(4):661-72. PubMed ID: 3467069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of smoking on achieving osseointegration of surface-modified implants: a clinical report.
    Kumar A; Jaffin RA; Berman C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):816-9. PubMed ID: 12507241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mineralization at the interface of implants.
    Joos U; Wiesmann HP; Szuwart T; Meyer U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):783-90. PubMed ID: 16697141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advancing dental implant surface technology--from micron- to nanotopography.
    Mendonça G; Mendonça DB; Aragão FJ; Cooper LF
    Biomaterials; 2008 Oct; 29(28):3822-35. PubMed ID: 18617258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histomorphometric analyses of bone interface with titanium-aluminum-vanadium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants by biomimetic process.
    Zagury R; Harari ND; Conz MB; Soares Gde A; Vidigal GM
    Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 17846545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
    Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wide-diameter implants: new concepts.
    Davarpanah M; Martinez H; Kebir M; Etienne D; Tecucianu JF
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 11829389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
    Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.