84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2632777)
21. The effect of crestal versus mucobuccal incisions on the success rate of implant osseointegration.
Scharf DR; Tarnow DP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 8359875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surface-etching enhances titanium implant osseointegration in newly formed (rhBMP-2-induced) and native bone.
Qahash M; Hardwick WR; Rohrer MD; Wozney JM; Wikesjö UM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 17622015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biological space adaptation to implant dimensions.
Sarment DP; Meraw SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 18416417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.
Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants.
Leonard G; Coelho P; Polyzois I; Stassen L; Claffey N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 19397634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Current status and prospectives in implantology].
Commissionat Y; Dubruille JH
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1997 Sep; 98(3):145-58. PubMed ID: 9340725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Osseointegration of rough acid-etched titanium implants: 5-year follow-up of 100 minimatic implants.
De Leonardis D; Garg AK; Pecora GE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):384-91. PubMed ID: 10379112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Success and failure rates of osseointegrated implants in function in regenerated bone for 6 to 51 months: a preliminary report.
Fugazzotto PA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 9048450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Current trends in immediate osseous dental implant case selection criteria.
McNutt MD; Chou CH
J Dent Educ; 2003 Aug; 67(8):850-9. PubMed ID: 12959158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Current trends in implantology: Part 1--Biological response, implant stability, and implant design.
Saadoun AP; Le Gall MG; Touati B
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 16(7):529-35; quiz 536, 521. PubMed ID: 15485167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Questions of principle and practice concerning the use of Diakor aluminum oxide in bioceramical oral endosseous implantation. III. Surgical intervention].
Divinyi T; Vajdovich I; Fazekas A
Fogorv Sz; 1991 Apr; 84(4):97-103. PubMed ID: 1855602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of static overload on the bony interface around implants in dogs.
Miyamoto Y; Koretake K; Hirata M; Kubo T; Akagawa Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(5):437-44. PubMed ID: 18950068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Histomorphometric and histologic observations of bone healing around immediate implants in dogs.
Parr GR; Steflik DE; Sisk AL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(5):534-40. PubMed ID: 8112793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.
Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Postmortem histologic evaluation of mandibular titanium and maxillary hydroxyapatite-coated implants from 1 patient.
Rohrer MD; Sobczak RR; Prasad HS; Morris HF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):579-86. PubMed ID: 10453675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: a finite element analysis.
Vaillancourt H; Pilliar RM; McCammond D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 8752556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Implant placement: surgical techniques and considerations.
Palmer RM; Palmer PJ
Dent Update; 1997 Sep; 24(7):288-94. PubMed ID: 9515343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
