These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2632800)
1. Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses. Durkin K; Manning J J Psycholinguist Res; 1989 Nov; 18(6):577-612. PubMed ID: 2632800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy. Li J; Joanisse MF Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions. Hoffman P; Woollams AM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The truth about chickens and bats: ambiguity avoidance distinguishes types of polysemy. Rabagliati H; Snedeker J Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1354-60. PubMed ID: 23722978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence. Pylkkänen L; Llinás R; Murphy GL J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 16417686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses. Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cross-language influences: translation status affects intraword sense relatedness. Degani T; Tokowicz N Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):1046-64. PubMed ID: 23658030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words]. Syssau A; Laxén J Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22390477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Hoffman P; Lambon Ralph MA; Rogers TT Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):718-30. PubMed ID: 23239067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap. Klepousniotou E; Titone D; Romero C J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1534-43. PubMed ID: 18980412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polysemy in Sentence Comprehension: Effects of Meaning Dominance. Foraker S; Murphy GL J Mem Lang; 2012 Nov; 67(4):407-425. PubMed ID: 23185103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words. Jager B; Cleland AA J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Feb; 45(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 25373555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Processing and Representation of Ambiguous Words in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements. Shen W; Li X Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1713. PubMed ID: 27857701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Not all ambiguous words are created equal: an EEG investigation of homonymy and polysemy. Klepousniotou E; Pike GB; Steinhauer K; Gracco V Brain Lang; 2012 Oct; 123(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 22819308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words. Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):421-439. PubMed ID: 28933895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing. Rice CA; Tokowicz N; Fraundorf SH; Liburd TL Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 31001796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning new meanings for old words: effects of semantic relatedness. Rodd JM; Berriman R; Landau M; Lee T; Ho C; Gaskell MG; Davis MH Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1095-108. PubMed ID: 22614728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities. Gilbert RA; Davis MH; Gaskell MG; Rodd JM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1533-1561. PubMed ID: 29389181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psycholinguistic measures for German verb pairs: Semantic transparency, semantic relatedness, verb family size, and age of reading acquisition. Smolka E; Eulitz C Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1540-1562. PubMed ID: 29916042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The long past and short history of the vocabulary of Anglophone psychology. Benjafield JG Hist Psychol; 2012 Feb; 15(1):50-71. PubMed ID: 22530378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]