287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26328628)
1. Impact of MLC properties and IMRT technique in meningioma and head-and-neck treatments.
Kantz S; Söhn M; Troeller A; Reiner M; Weingandt H; Alber M; Belka C; Ganswindt U
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Sep; 10():184. PubMed ID: 26328628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New possibilities for volumetric-modulated arc therapy using the Agility™ 160-leaf multileaf collimator.
Blümer N; Scherf C; Köhn J; Kara E; Loutfi-Krauß B; Imhoff D; Rödel C; Ramm U; Licher J
Strahlenther Onkol; 2014 Oct; 190(11):1066-74. PubMed ID: 25060175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Capability of leaf interdigitation with different inverse planning strategies in Monaco: an investigation of representative tumour sites.
Duan J; Meng X; Liu T; Yin Y
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jun; 11():82. PubMed ID: 27316707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rotational IMRT techniques compared to fixed gantry IMRT and tomotherapy: multi-institutional planning study for head-and-neck cases.
Wiezorek T; Brachwitz T; Georg D; Blank E; Fotina I; Habl G; Kretschmer M; Lutters G; Salz H; Schubert K; Wagner D; Wendt TG
Radiat Oncol; 2011 Feb; 6():20. PubMed ID: 21338501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of head and neck cancer.
Bertelsen A; Hansen CR; Johansen J; Brink C
Radiother Oncol; 2010 May; 95(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 20188427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs.
Fathy MM; Hassan BZ; El-Gebaly RH; Mokhtar MH
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2023 Mar; 62(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 36576578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved VMAT planning for head and neck tumors with an advanced optimization algorithm.
Klippel N; Schmücking M; Terribilini D; Geretschläger A; Aebersold DM; Manser P
Z Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 25(4):333-340. PubMed ID: 26071076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interplay effect on a 6-MV flattening-filter-free linear accelerator with high dose rate and fast multi-leaf collimator motion treating breast and lung phantoms.
Netherton T; Li Y; Nitsch P; Shaitelman S; Balter P; Gao S; Klopp A; Muruganandham M; Court L
Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2369-2376. PubMed ID: 29611210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of auto-planning in IMRT and VMAT for head and neck cancer.
Ouyang Z; Liu Shen Z; Murray E; Kolar M; LaHurd D; Yu N; Joshi N; Koyfman S; Bzdusek K; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):39-47. PubMed ID: 31270937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of unified intensity-modulated arc therapy for the radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer.
MacFarlane M; Hoover DA; Wong E; Read N; Palma D; Venkatesan V; Hammond A; Battista JJ; Chen JZ
Radiother Oncol; 2016 May; 119(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 27041142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous integrated boost therapy of carcinoma of the hypopharynx/larynx with and without flattening filter - a treatment planning and dosimetry study.
Dobler B; Obermeier T; Hautmann MG; Khemissi A; Koelbl O
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jul; 12(1):114. PubMed ID: 28679448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
