These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26328675)

  • 1. Poor phonetic perceivers are affected by cognitive load when resolving talker variability.
    Antoniou M; Wong PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):571-4. PubMed ID: 26328675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory.
    Lim SJ; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1167-1177. PubMed ID: 30737757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial release of cognitive load measured in a dual-task paradigm in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Xia J; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):1888-98. PubMed ID: 25920841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
    van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects.
    Clopper CG; Pisoni DB
    Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 3):207-39. PubMed ID: 15697151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial and temporal modifications of multitalker speech can improve speech perception in older adults.
    Gygi B; Shafiro V
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():76-86. PubMed ID: 24530609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural bases of talker normalization.
    Wong PC; Nusbaum HC; Small SL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1173-84. PubMed ID: 15453972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selecting among competing models of talker adaptation: Attention, cognition, and memory in speech processing efficiency.
    Kapadia AM; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104393. PubMed ID: 32688132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.
    Choi JY; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103982. PubMed ID: 31229740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Talker-specific influences on phonetic category structure.
    Theodore RM; Myers EB; Lomibao JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):1068-78. PubMed ID: 26328722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning individual talkers' structural preferences.
    Kamide Y
    Cognition; 2012 Jul; 124(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 22498776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Desirable and undesirable difficulties: Influences of variability, training schedule, and aptitude on nonnative phonetic learning.
    Fuhrmeister P; Myers EB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2049-2065. PubMed ID: 31970707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple sources of acoustic variation affect speech processing efficiency.
    Kapadia AM; Tin JAA; Perrachione TK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):209. PubMed ID: 36732274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Talker information influences spectral contrast effects in speech categorization.
    Assgari AA; Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3023-32. PubMed ID: 26627776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anterior paracingulate and cingulate cortex mediates the effects of cognitive load on speech sound discrimination.
    Gennari SP; Millman RE; Hymers M; Mattys SL
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():735-743. PubMed ID: 29902588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.