These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26328675)

  • 21. Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants.
    Jusczyk PW; Pisoni DB; Mullennix J
    Cognition; 1992 Jun; 43(3):253-91. PubMed ID: 1643815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why are listeners hindered by talker variability?
    Luthra S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):104-121. PubMed ID: 37580454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Training-induced brain activation and functional connectivity differentiate multi-talker and single-talker speech training.
    Deng Z; Chandrasekaran B; Wang S; Wong PCM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2018 May; 151():1-9. PubMed ID: 29535043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Talker adaptation or "talker" adaptation? Musical instrument variability impedes pitch perception.
    Shorey AE; King CJ; Theodore RM; Stilp CE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Oct; 85(7):2488-2501. PubMed ID: 37258892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Spatial Release of Cognitive Load in Cocktail Party Is Determined by the Relative Levels of the Talkers.
    Andéol G; Suied C; Scannella S; Dehais F
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 18(3):457-464. PubMed ID: 28101695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Varying acoustic-phonemic ambiguity reveals that talker normalization is obligatory in speech processing.
    Choi JY; Hu ER; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):784-797. PubMed ID: 29417449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Talker identification across source mechanisms: experiments with laryngeal and electrolarynx speech.
    Perrachione TK; Stepp CE; Hillman RE; Wong PC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1651-65. PubMed ID: 24801962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories.
    Lively SE; Logan JS; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1242-55. PubMed ID: 8408964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional resources contribute to the perceptual learning of talker idiosyncrasies in audiovisual speech.
    Jesse A; Kaplan E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1006-1019. PubMed ID: 30684204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multiple talker processing in autistic adult listeners.
    Alispahic S; Pellicano E; Cutler A; Antoniou M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14698. PubMed ID: 38926416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Poorer phonetic perceivers show greater benefit in phonetic-phonological speech learning.
    Ingvalson EM; Barr AM; Wong PC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 23275405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of intelligibility on working memory demand for speech perception.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1360-74. PubMed ID: 19633351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of language experience and expectations on attention to consonants and tones in English and Mandarin Chinese.
    Lin M; Francis AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2827-38. PubMed ID: 25373982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production.
    Newman RS; Clouse SA; Burnham JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1181-96. PubMed ID: 11303932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Unequal effects of speech and nonspeech contexts on the perceptual normalization of Cantonese level tones.
    Zhang C; Peng G; Wang WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1088-99. PubMed ID: 22894228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Words Get in the Way: Linguistic Effects on Talker Discrimination.
    Narayan CR; Mak L; Bialystok E
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Jul; 41(5):1361-1376. PubMed ID: 27445079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.