These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26328697)

  • 1. Unmasking the effects of masking on performance: The potential of multiple-voice masking in the office environment.
    Keus van de Poll M; Carlsson J; Marsh JE; Ljung R; Odelius J; Schlittmeier SJ; Sundin G; Sörqvist P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):807-16. PubMed ID: 26328697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Office noise: Can headphones and masking sound attenuate distraction by background speech?
    Jahncke H; Björkeholm P; Marsh JE; Odelius J; Sörqvist P
    Work; 2016 Nov; 55(3):505-513. PubMed ID: 27768004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Energetic and informational masking in a simulated restaurant environment.
    Culling JF
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():511-8. PubMed ID: 23716258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S; Li L; Wu X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X; Yang Z; Huang Y; Chen J; Li L; Daneman M; Schneider BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Irrelevant speech effect under stationary and adaptive masking conditions.
    Park M; Kohlrausch A; van Leest A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):1970-81. PubMed ID: 23967930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
    Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance effects and subjective disturbance of speech in acoustically different office types--a laboratory experiment.
    Haka M; Haapakangas A; Keränen J; Hakala J; Keskinen E; Hongisto V
    Indoor Air; 2009 Dec; 19(6):454-67. PubMed ID: 19702627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual-gestural (mis)mapping in serial short-term memory: the impact of talker variability.
    Hughes RW; Marsh JE; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1411-25. PubMed ID: 19857013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory disruption by irrelevant noise-vocoded speech: Effects of native language and the number of frequency bands.
    Ellermeier W; Kattner F; Ueda K; Doumoto K; Nakajima Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1561-9. PubMed ID: 26428793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is level irrelevant in "irrelevant speech"? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking.
    Ellermeier W; Hellbruck J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1406-14. PubMed ID: 9988598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional topography of working memory for face or voice identity.
    Rämä P; Courtney SM
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):224-34. PubMed ID: 15588614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of listeners' working memory and noise on speech intelligibility in dysarthria.
    Lee Y; Sung JE; Sim H
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2014 Oct; 28(10):785-95. PubMed ID: 24712561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Masking of speech in people with first-episode schizophrenia and people with chronic schizophrenia.
    Wu C; Cao S; Zhou F; Wang C; Wu X; Li L
    Schizophr Res; 2012 Jan; 134(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 22019075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating the influence of continuous babble on auditory short-term memory performance.
    Heinrich A; Schneider BA; Craik FI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):735-51. PubMed ID: 17853231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.