These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26328731)

  • 41. Prevalence of vocal fry in young adult male American English speakers.
    Abdelli-Beruh NB; Wolk L; Slavin D
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 24315658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Audio-vocal responses of vocal fundamental frequency and formant during sustained vowel vocalizations in different noises.
    Lee SH; Hsiao TY; Lee GS
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():1-6. PubMed ID: 25749240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A "voice inversion effect?".
    Bédard C; Belin P
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):247-9. PubMed ID: 15177788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of simultaneous perturbations of voice pitch and loudness feedback on voice F0 and amplitude control.
    Larson CR; Sun J; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2862-72. PubMed ID: 17550185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Static features in real-time recognition of isolated vowels at high pitch.
    Ferreira AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2389-404. PubMed ID: 17902873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. F0 in the production of lenis and fortis plosives.
    Kohler KJ
    Phonetica; 1982; 39(4-5):199-218. PubMed ID: 7156204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Discrimination functions: can they be used to classify singing voices?
    Erickson ML; Perry S; Handel S
    J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):492-502. PubMed ID: 11792025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Auditory brainstem's sensitivity to human voices.
    Nan Y; Skoe E; Nicol T; Kraus N
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 25620126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Voice analysis of postlingually deaf adults pre- and postcochlear implantation.
    Ubrig MT; Goffi-Gomez MV; Weber R; Menezes MH; Nemr NK; Tsuji DH; Tsuji RK
    J Voice; 2011 Nov; 25(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 21367577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Voice similarity in identical twins.
    Van Gysel WD; Vercammen J; Debruyne F
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 2001; 55(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 11256192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The timbre of sung vowels.
    Bloothooft G; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):847-60. PubMed ID: 3183203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2855-65. PubMed ID: 22087914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The verbal transformation effect and the perceptual organization of speech: influence of formant transitions and F0-contour continuity.
    Stachurski M; Summers RJ; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():22-31. PubMed ID: 25620314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dialect experience and perceptual integrality in phonological registers: fundamental frequency, voice quality and the first formant in Cham.
    Brunelle M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3088-102. PubMed ID: 22501082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception.
    Yu KM; Lam HW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1320. PubMed ID: 25190405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of vocal intensity and vowel type on cepstral analysis of voice.
    Awan SN; Giovinco A; Owens J
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):670.e15-20. PubMed ID: 22480754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.