293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26328992)
1. Coverage-based treatment planning to accommodate delineation uncertainties in prostate cancer treatment.
Xu H; Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5435-43. PubMed ID: 26328992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coverage-based treatment planning to accommodate deformable organ variations in prostate cancer treatment.
Xu H; Vile DJ; Sharma M; Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101705. PubMed ID: 25281944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of non-exclusion of the rectum from the boost PTV in IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients.
Kassim I; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19278745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical adequacy assessment of autocontours for prostate IMRT with meaningful endpoints.
Nourzadeh H; Watkins WT; Ahmed M; Hui C; Schlesinger D; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1525-1537. PubMed ID: 28196288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric effects of the prone and supine positions on image guided localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Liu B; Lerma FA; Patel S; Amin P; Feng Y; Yi BY; Yu C
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 18207595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.
Stroom JC; de Boer HC; Huizenga H; Visser AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(4):905-19. PubMed ID: 10098447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating systematic patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher M; Silva J; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1102-11. PubMed ID: 22320820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image-guided IMRT for localized prostate cancer with daily repositioning: inferring the difference between planned dose and delivered dose distribution.
Arnaud A; Maingon P; Gauthier M; Naudy S; Dumas JL; Martin E; Peignaux-Casasnovas K; Truc G; Bonnetain F; Crehange G
Phys Med; 2014 Sep; 30(6):669-75. PubMed ID: 24792687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy using 4D CT and multiphase CT images for treatment planning of lung cancer: evaluation of the impact on daily dose coverage.
Wang L; Hayes S; Paskalev K; Jin L; Buyyounouski MK; Ma CC; Feigenberg S
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 19111362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of interpatient and intrapatient rectum variation on external beam treatment of prostate cancer.
Yan D; Xu B; Lockman D; Kota K; Brabbins DS; Wong J; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(4):1111-9. PubMed ID: 11704336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of high dose volumetric CT on PTV margin reduction in VMAT prostate radiotherapy.
Cho YB; Alasti H; Kong V; Catton C; Berlin A; Chung P; Bayley A; Jaffray D
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065017. PubMed ID: 30731450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of clinical margins via simulation of patient setup errors in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Crimaldi AJ; Hagan M; Moore J; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):202-14. PubMed ID: 17278506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the clinical aspects of using CT vs. CT-MRI images during organ delineation and treatment planning in prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Tzikas A; Karaiskos P; Papanikolaou N; Sandilos P; Koutsouveli E; Lavdas E; Scarleas C; Dardoufas K; Lind BK; Mavroidis P
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jun; 10(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 21517129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric and radiobiological consequences of computed tomography-guided adaptive strategies for intensity modulated radiation therapy of the prostate.
Battista JJ; Johnson C; Turnbull D; Kempe J; Bzdusek K; Van Dyk J; Bauman G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 23978708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential benefits of dosimetric VMAT tracking verified with 3D film measurements.
Crijns W; Defraene G; Van Herck H; Depuydt T; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2162. PubMed ID: 27147328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy.
Killoran JH; Kooy HM; Gladstone DJ; Welte FJ; Beard CJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 9054898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
