492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26329923)
1. Comparison Between Non-invasive (Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Derived) and Invasive-Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Serial Stenoses Within One Coronary Artery: A NXT Trial substudy.
Tanaka K; Bezerra HG; Gaur S; Attizzani GF; Bøtker HE; Costa MA; Rogers C; Nørgaard BL
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Feb; 44(2):580-9. PubMed ID: 26329923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Performance of Transluminal Attenuation Gradient and Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from 320-Detector Row CT Angiography to Diagnose Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Stenosis: An NXT Substudy.
Ko BS; Wong DT; Nørgaard BL; Leong DP; Cameron JD; Gaur S; Marwan M; Achenbach S; Kuribayashi S; Kimura T; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26444662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial.
Nørgaard BL; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Ito H; Miyoshi T; Park SJ; Zvaigzne L; Tzemos N; Jensen JM; Hansson N; Ko B; Bezerra H; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 26298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.
Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy and discrimination of ischemia by fractional flow reserve CT using a clinical use rule: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic Angiography study.
Thompson AG; Raju R; Blanke P; Yang TH; Mancini GB; Budoff MJ; Norgaard BL; Min JK; Leipsic JA
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 25819194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Cami E; Tagami T; Raff G; Fonte TA; Renard B; Gallagher MJ; Chinnaiyan K; Bilolikar A; Fan A; Hafeez A; Safian RD
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(6):480-492. PubMed ID: 30274795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) study.
Gaur S; Achenbach S; Leipsic J; Mauri L; Bezerra HG; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(5):279-88. PubMed ID: 24268114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting the Physiological Effect of Revascularization in Serially Diseased Coronary Arteries.
Modi BN; Sankaran S; Kim HJ; Ellis H; Rogers C; Taylor CA; Rajani R; Perera D
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007577. PubMed ID: 30722688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: variation of repeated analyses.
Gaur S; Bezerra HG; Lassen JF; Christiansen EH; Tanaka K; Jensen JM; Oldroyd KG; Leipsic J; Achenbach S; Kaltoft AK; Bøtker HE; Nørgaard BL
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 25151923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detecting lesion-specific ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease with computed tomography fractional flow reserve measured at different sites.
Cai Z; Yu T; Yang Z; Hu H; Lin Y; Zhang H; Chen M; Shi G; Shen J
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jun; 23(1):76. PubMed ID: 37277697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography in Nonculprit Lesions of Patients With Recent STEMI.
Gaur S; Taylor CA; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft AK; Holm NR; Leipsic J; Zarins CK; Achenbach S; Khem S; Wilk A; Bezerra HG; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 10(4):424-433. PubMed ID: 27743953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT angiography (CTA) and diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic CTA (DeFACTO) study.
Leipsic J; Yang TH; Thompson A; Koo BK; Mancini GB; Taylor C; Budoff MJ; Park HB; Berman DS; Min JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 May; 202(5):989-94. PubMed ID: 24758651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic efficacy of fractional flow reserve with coronary angiography in dual-source computed tomography scanner.
Xia G; Fan D; Yao X; Guan G; Wang J
Acta Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 73(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28830299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-invasive procedural planning using computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve.
Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; Driessen RS; van Diemen PA; Everaars H; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; van Rossum AC; Sprengers RW; Verouden NJW; Nap A; Opolski MP; Leipsic JA; Danad I; Taylor CA; Knaapen P
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 97(4):614-622. PubMed ID: 32845067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimized interpretation of fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography: Comparison of three interpretation methods.
Takagi H; Ishikawa Y; Orii M; Ota H; Niiyama M; Tanaka R; Morino Y; Yoshioka K
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 30385326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpreting results of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in clinical practice.
Rabbat MG; Berman DS; Kern M; Raff G; Chinnaiyan K; Koweek L; Shaw LJ; Blanke P; Scherer M; Jensen JM; Lesser J; Nørgaard BL; Pontone G; De Bruyne B; Bax JJ; Leipsic J
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):383-388. PubMed ID: 28666784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.
Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis.
Tanigaki T; Emori H; Kawase Y; Kubo T; Omori H; Shiono Y; Sobue Y; Shimamura K; Hirata T; Matsuo Y; Ota H; Kitabata H; Okubo M; Ino Y; Matsuo H; Akasaka T
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2050-2059. PubMed ID: 31648766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of the Optimal Measurement Point for Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From CTA Using Pressure Wire Assessment as Reference.
Omori H; Hara M; Sobue Y; Kawase Y; Mizukami T; Tanigaki T; Hirata T; Ota H; Okubo M; Hirakawa A; Suzuki T; Kondo T; Leipsic J; Nørgaard BL; Matsuo H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jun; 216(6):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 32876482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
