BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26330485)

  • 1. Performance Comparison of CGM Systems: MARD Values Are Not Always a Reliable Indicator of CGM System Accuracy.
    Kirchsteiger H; Heinemann L; Freckmann G; Lodwig V; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 9(5):1030-40. PubMed ID: 26330485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
    Wadwa RP; Laffel LM; Shah VN; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 29901421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Significance and Reliability of MARD for the Accuracy of CGM Systems.
    Reiterer F; Polterauer P; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redecker G; Freckmann G; Heinemann L; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 11(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 27566735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits and Limitations of MARD as a Performance Parameter for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Interstitial Space.
    Heinemann L; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redecker G; Hinzmann R; Kassab A; Freckmann G; Reiterer F; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 14(1):135-150. PubMed ID: 31216870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluation of three continuous glucose monitoring systems: comparison of six sensors per subject in parallel.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 23911165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Studies.
    Laffel L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S223-33. PubMed ID: 26784126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system under conditions similar to daily life.
    Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):833-41. PubMed ID: 23911164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance evaluations of continuous glucose monitoring systems: precision absolute relative deviation is part of the assessment.
    Obermaier K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Klötzer HM; Kirchsteiger H; Eikmeier H; del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):824-32. PubMed ID: 23911163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the performance of a novel system for continuous glucose monitoring.
    Zschornack E; Schmid C; Pleus S; Link M; Klötzer HM; Obermaier K; Schoemaker M; Strasser M; Frisch G; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):815-23. PubMed ID: 23911162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy and Safety of an Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: The PRECISION Study.
    Christiansen MP; Klaff LJ; Bailey TS; Brazg R; Carlson G; Tweden KS
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 May; 21(5):231-237. PubMed ID: 30925083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Calibrated With Capillary Values Using Capillary or Venous Glucose Levels as a Reference.
    Andelin M; Kropff J; Matuleviciene V; Joseph JI; Attvall S; Theodorsson E; Hirsch IB; Imberg H; Dahlqvist S; Klonoff D; Haraldsson B; DeVries JH; Lind M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 26810924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of time point of calibration on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
    Zueger T; Diem P; Mougiakakou S; Stettler C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jul; 14(7):583-8. PubMed ID: 22512266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time Delay of CGM Sensors: Relevance, Causes, and Countermeasures.
    Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Kirchsteiger H; Freckmann G; Heinemann L; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 9(5):1006-15. PubMed ID: 26243773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
    Pleus S; Schoemaker M; Morgenstern K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Link M; Zschornack E; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 25852074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II.
    Christiansen MP; Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Chang AR; Levy CJ; Lam D; Denham DS; Atiee G; Bode BW; Walters SJ; Kelley L; Bailey TS
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Mar; 20(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 29381090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of a Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Utilizing an Automated Sensor Applicator.
    Shah VN; Laffel LM; Wadwa RP; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):428-433. PubMed ID: 29923775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance characterization of an abiotic and fluorescent-based continuous glucose monitoring system in patients with type 1 diabetes.
    Mortellaro M; DeHennis A
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2014 Nov; 61():227-31. PubMed ID: 24906080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance and Usability of Three Systems for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Direct Comparison.
    Freckmann G; Link M; Kamecke U; Haug C; Baumgartner B; Weitgasser R
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Sep; 13(5):890-898. PubMed ID: 30730229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and Longevity of an Implantable Continuous Glucose Sensor in the PRECISE Study: A 180-Day, Prospective, Multicenter, Pivotal Trial.
    Kropff J; Choudhary P; Neupane S; Barnard K; Bain SC; Kapitza C; Forst T; Link M; Dehennis A; DeVries JH
    Diabetes Care; 2017 Jan; 40(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 27815290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy Between Abdominal and Upper Arm Insertion Sites.
    Steineck IIK; Mahmoudi Z; Ranjan A; Schmidt S; Jørgensen JB; Nørgaard K
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 May; 21(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 30994362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.