These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26330772)

  • 21. The impact of fiberwire, fiberloop, and locking suture configuration on flexor tendon repairs.
    Haimovici L; Papafragkou S; Lee W; Dagum A; Hurst LC
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):468-70. PubMed ID: 22964669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanical Study of Modified Massachusetts General Hospital Flexor Tendon Repair Using Looped Sutures.
    Wang Q; Wong YR; McGROUTHER DA
    J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2022 Jun; 27(3):473-479. PubMed ID: 35808880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Number of suture throws and its impact on the biomechanical properties of the four-strand cruciate locked flexor tendon repair with FiberWire.
    Le SV; Chiu S; Meineke RC; Williams P; Wongworawat MD
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2012 Nov; 37(9):826-31. PubMed ID: 22618562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical Analysis of the Modified Kessler, Lahey, Adelaide, and Becker Sutures for Flexor Tendon Repair.
    Jordan MC; Schmitt V; Jansen H; Meffert RH; Hoelscher-Doht S
    J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Sep; 40(9):1812-7. PubMed ID: 26211716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical comparisons of four-strand tendon repairs with double-stranded sutures: effects of different locks and suture geometry.
    Wu YF; Cao Y; Zhou YL; Tang JB
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2011 Jan; 36(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 20682582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of a multifilament stainless steel suture with FiberWire for flexor tendon repairs--an in vitro biomechanical study.
    McDonald E; Gordon JA; Buckley JM; Gordon L
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2013 May; 38(4):418-23. PubMed ID: 22745156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of a new multifilament stainless steel suture with frequently used sutures for flexor tendon repair.
    McDonald E; Gordon JA; Buckley JM; Gordon L
    J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Jun; 36(6):1028-34. PubMed ID: 21636021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Zone I flexor digitorum profundus repair: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis of tendon to bone repair in cadavera.
    Dovan TT; Gelberman RH; Kusano N; Calcaterra M; Silva MJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 30(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 15781347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Barbed suture vs conventional tenorrhaphy: biomechanical analysis in an animal model.
    Clemente A; Bergamin F; Surace C; Lepore E; Pugno N
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2015 Sep; 16(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 25628013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of Different Core Suture Lengths on Tensile Strength of Multiple-Strand Sutures for Flexor Tendon Repair.
    Chinen S; Okubo H; Kusano N; Kinjo M; Kanaya F; Nishida K
    J Hand Surg Glob Online; 2021 Jan; 3(1):41-46. PubMed ID: 35415532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs.
    Barrie KA; Tomak SL; Cholewicki J; Merrell GA; Wolfe SW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2001 Mar; 26(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 11279582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of a knotless flexor tendon repair using a multifilament stainless steel cable-crimp system.
    Gordon L; Matsui J; McDonald E; Gordon JA; Neimkin R
    J Hand Surg Am; 2013 Apr; 38(4):677-83. PubMed ID: 23453895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The four-strand staggered suture for flexor tendon repair: in vitro biomechanical study.
    Corradi M; Bellan M; Frattini M; Concari G; Tocco S; Pogliacomi F
    J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Jun; 35(6):948-55. PubMed ID: 20513576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of a knotless four-strand flexor tendon repair with a unidirectional barbed suture device: a dynamic ex vivo comparison.
    Peltz TS; Haddad R; Scougall PJ; Gianoutsos MP; Bertollo N; Walsh WR
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2014 Jan; 39(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 23435491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Flexor tendon repair: a comparative study between a knotless barbed suture repair and a traditional four-strand monofilament suture repair.
    Joyce CW; Whately KE; Chan JC; Murphy M; O'Brien FJ; Carroll SM
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2014 Jan; 39(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 23695149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanic comparison of the Teno Fix tendon repair device with the cruciate and modified Kessler techniques.
    Wolfe SW; Willis AA; Campbell D; Clabeaux J; Wright TM
    J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Mar; 32(3):356-66. PubMed ID: 17336844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of testing conditions on primary stability of arthroscopic knot tying for rotator cuff repair: slippery when wet?
    Pietschmann MF; Sadoghi P; Häuser E; Scharpf A; Gülecyüz MF; Schröder C; Jansson V; Müller PE
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1628-36. PubMed ID: 21945675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Flexor tendon repair using a new suture technique: a comparative in vitro biomechanical study.
    Schädel-Höpfner M; Windolf J; Lögters TT; Hakimi M; Celik I
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2011 Feb; 37(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 26814755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of asymmetric core suture purchase on gap resistance of tendon repair in linear cyclic loading.
    Wu YF; Tang JB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2014 May; 39(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 24630942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of different length of core suture purchase among suture row on the strength of 6-strand tendon repairs.
    Okubo H; Kusano N; Kinjo M; Kanaya F
    Hand Surg; 2015; 20(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25609270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.