These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26331630)

  • 1. A geometric correction scheme for spatial leakage effects in MEG/EEG seed-based functional connectivity mapping.
    Wens V; Marty B; Mary A; Bourguignon M; Op de Beeck M; Goldman S; Van Bogaert P; Peigneux P; De Tiège X
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Nov; 36(11):4604-21. PubMed ID: 26331630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards an objective evaluation of EEG/MEG source estimation methods - The linear approach.
    Hauk O; Stenroos M; Treder MS
    Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 255():119177. PubMed ID: 35390459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phase shift invariant imaging of coherent sources (PSIICOS) from MEG data.
    Ossadtchi A; Altukhov D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():950-971. PubMed ID: 30142449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
    Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
    Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
    Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EEG-MEG Integration Enhances the Characterization of Functional and Effective Connectivity in the Resting State Network.
    Muthuraman M; Moliadze V; Mideksa KG; Anwar AR; Stephani U; Deuschl G; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140832. PubMed ID: 26509448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of the Geometric Correction Scheme on MEG Functional Topology at Rest.
    Della Penna S; Corbetta M; Wens V; de Pasquale F
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1114. PubMed ID: 31708725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of Magnetoencephalography and High-Density Electroencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity Metrics.
    Marquetand J; Vannoni S; Carboni M; Li Hegner Y; Stier C; Braun C; Focke NK
    Brain Connect; 2019 Sep; 9(7):539-553. PubMed ID: 31115272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptive cortical parcellations for source reconstructed EEG/MEG connectomes.
    Farahibozorg SR; Henson RN; Hauk O
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():23-45. PubMed ID: 28893608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hierarchical multiscale Bayesian algorithm for robust MEG/EEG source reconstruction.
    Cai C; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():698-715. PubMed ID: 30059734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
    Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A framework for the design of flexible cross-talk functions for spatial filtering of EEG/MEG data: DeFleCT.
    Hauk O; Stenroos M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Apr; 35(4):1642-53. PubMed ID: 23616402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.
    Gramfort A; Luessi M; Larson E; Engemann DA; Strohmeier D; Brodbeck C; Parkkonen L; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():446-60. PubMed ID: 24161808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple constrained minimum variance beamformer (MCMV) performance in connectivity analyses.
    Nunes AS; Moiseev A; Kozhemiako N; Cheung T; Ribary U; Doesburg SM
    Neuroimage; 2020 Mar; 208():116386. PubMed ID: 31786165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.