These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26331673)

  • 1. Overhearers Use Addressee Backchannels in Dialog Comprehension.
    Tolins J; Fox Tree JE
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 40(6):1412-34. PubMed ID: 26331673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forgotten Little Words: How Backchannels and Particles May Facilitate Speech Planning in Conversation?
    Knudsen B; Creemers A; Meyer AS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():593671. PubMed ID: 33240183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A job interview in the MRI scanner: How does indirectness affect addressees and overhearers?
    Bašnáková J; van Berkum J; Weber K; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Sep; 76():79-91. PubMed ID: 25858603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Socio-cultural perception of robot backchannels.
    Engwall O; Cumbal R; Majlesi AR
    Front Robot AI; 2023; 10():988042. PubMed ID: 36777379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis of turn-taking and backchannels based on prosodic and syntactic features in Japanese map task dialogs.
    Koiso H; Horiuchi Y; Tutiya S; Ichikawa A; Den Y
    Lang Speech; 1998; 41 ( Pt 3-4)():295-321. PubMed ID: 10746360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bilingual Children's Narrative Comprehension: Do Pauses during Retelling Buy Time for Understanding?
    Schönpflug U; Küpping-Faturikova L
    J Genet Psychol; 2020; 181(4):206-222. PubMed ID: 32319864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of filled pauses on the processing of the surface form and the establishment of causal connections during the comprehension of spoken expository discourse.
    Cevasco J; van den Broek P
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 26899571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Listeners' comprehension of uptalk in spontaneous speech.
    Tomlinson JM; Fox Tree JE
    Cognition; 2011 Apr; 119(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 21237451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. I Forget What That's Called! Children's Online Processing of Disfluencies Depends on Speaker Knowledge.
    Orena AJ; White KS
    Child Dev; 2015; 86(6):1701-9. PubMed ID: 26344559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Montclair Map Task: Balance, Efficacy, and Efficiency in Conversational Interaction.
    Pardo JS; Urmanche A; Gash H; Wiener J; Mason N; Wilman S; Francis K; Decker A
    Lang Speech; 2019 Jun; 62(2):378-398. PubMed ID: 29857788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of speaker gaze on listener comprehension: contrasting visual versus intentional accounts.
    Staudte M; Crocker MW; Heloir A; Kipp M
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):317-28. PubMed ID: 25079951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
    Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemispheric inference priming during comprehension of conversations and narratives.
    Powers C; Bencic R; Horton WS; Beeman M
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Sep; 50(11):2577-83. PubMed ID: 22820639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Listeners' uses of um and uh in speech comprehension.
    Fox Tree JE
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):320-6. PubMed ID: 11352215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Respiratory markers of conversational interaction.
    McFarland DH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 44(1):128-43. PubMed ID: 11218097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speakers' overestimation of their effectiveness.
    Keysar B; Henly AS
    Psychol Sci; 2002 May; 13(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 12009039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thee, uhh disfluency effect in preschoolers: A cue to discourse status.
    Owens SJ; Graham SA
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2016 Sep; 34(3):388-401. PubMed ID: 26914645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Talk-in-interaction and neuropsychological processes.
    Finset A
    Scand J Psychol; 2014 Jun; 55(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 24758614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech overlap in Japanese mother-child conversations.
    Kajikawa S; Amano S; Kondo T
    J Child Lang; 2004 Feb; 31(1):215-30. PubMed ID: 15053091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talking is harder than listening: The time course of dual-task costs during naturalistic conversation.
    Lee AMC; Cerisano S; Humphreys KR; Watter S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Jun; 71(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 28604048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.