201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26332011)
41. Can current dietary exposure models handle aggregated intake from different foods? A simulation study for the case of two foods.
Slob W; de Boer WJ; van der Voet H
Food Chem Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):178-86. PubMed ID: 19799957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Group level validation of protein intakes estimated by 24-hour diet recall and dietary questionnaires against 24-hour urinary nitrogen in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study.
Slimani N; Bingham S; Runswick S; Ferrari P; Day NE; Welch AA; Key TJ; Miller AB; Boeing H; Sieri S; Veglia F; Palli D; Panico S; Tumino R; Bueno-De-Mesquita B; Ocké MC; Clavel-Chapelon F; Trichopoulou A; Van Staveren WA; Riboli E
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Aug; 12(8):784-95. PubMed ID: 12917211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Efficient regression calibration for logistic regression in main study/internal validation study designs with an imperfect reference instrument.
Spiegelman D; Carroll RJ; Kipnis V
Stat Med; 2001 Jan; 20(1):139-160. PubMed ID: 11135353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Dietary fat and coronary heart disease: a comparison of approaches for adjusting for total energy intake and modeling repeated dietary measurements.
Hu FB; Stampfer MJ; Rimm E; Ascherio A; Rosner BA; Spiegelman D; Willett WC
Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Mar; 149(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 10084242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Bayesian semiparametric regression in the presence of conditionally heteroscedastic measurement and regression errors.
Sarkar A; Mallick BK; Carroll RJ
Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):823-34. PubMed ID: 24965117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Regression analysis with covariates that have heteroscedastic measurement error.
Guo Y; Little RJ
Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(18):2278-94. PubMed ID: 21590792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Dietary intake in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults: a comparison of dietary assessment methods.
Hendricks K; Tang A; Spiegelman D; Skinner S; Woods M
J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Apr; 105(4):532-40. PubMed ID: 15800553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The food propensity questionnaire: concept, development, and validation for use as a covariate in a model to estimate usual food intake.
Subar AF; Dodd KW; Guenther PM; Kipnis V; Midthune D; McDowell M; Tooze JA; Freedman LS; Krebs-Smith SM
J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Oct; 106(10):1556-63. PubMed ID: 17000188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
Chatburn RL
AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A multivariate method for measurement error correction using pairs of concentration biomarkers.
Fraser GE; Yan R
Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 17140813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A moment-adjusted imputation method for measurement error models.
Thomas L; Stefanski L; Davidian M
Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1461-70. PubMed ID: 21385161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Dietary intake in the dependent elderly: evaluation of the risk of nutritional deficit.
Fernández-Barrés S; Martín N; Canela T; García-Barco M; Basora J; Arija V;
J Hum Nutr Diet; 2016 Apr; 29(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 25918988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Combining biomarker and food intake data: calibration equations for citrus intake.
D'Angelo S; Gormley IC; McNulty BA; Nugent AP; Walton J; Flynn A; Brennan L
Am J Clin Nutr; 2019 Oct; 110(4):977-983. PubMed ID: 31432078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Dietary fat and postmenopausal invasive breast cancer in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort.
Thiébaut AC; Kipnis V; Chang SC; Subar AF; Thompson FE; Rosenberg PS; Hollenbeck AR; Leitzmann M; Schatzkin A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(6):451-62. PubMed ID: 17374835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The Bambui health and aging study: is calibration of dietary intake necessary among older adults?
Lopes AC; Caiaffa WT; Mingoti SA; Lima-Costa MF
J Nutr Health Aging; 2004; 8(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 15359354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 1-Basic theory and simple methods of adjustment.
Keogh RH; Shaw PA; Gustafson P; Carroll RJ; Deffner V; Dodd KW; Küchenhoff H; Tooze JA; Wallace MP; Kipnis V; Freedman LS
Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(16):2197-2231. PubMed ID: 32246539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution.
Tooze JA; Midthune D; Dodd KW; Freedman LS; Krebs-Smith SM; Subar AF; Guenther PM; Carroll RJ; Kipnis V
J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Oct; 106(10):1575-87. PubMed ID: 17000190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Design aspects of calibration studies in nutrition, with analysis of missing data in linear measurement error models.
Carroll RJ; Freedman L; Pee D
Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1440-57. PubMed ID: 9423259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Implications of a new dietary measurement error model for estimation of relative risk: application to four calibration studies.
Kipnis V; Carroll RJ; Freedman LS; Li L
Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 150(6):642-51. PubMed ID: 10490004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Regression calibration to correct correlated errors in outcome and exposure.
Shaw PA; He J; Shepherd BE
Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 33086428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
