904 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26332022)
1. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transulnar Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Sedhom R; Megaly M; Abraham B; George JC; Kalra S; Janzer S
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2021 May; 26():39-45. PubMed ID: 33203582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and efficacy of transulnar approach for coronary angiography and intervention.
Li YZ; Zhou YJ; Zhao YX; Guo YH; Liu YY; Shi DM; Wang ZJ; Jia DA; Yang SW; Nie B; Han HY; Hu B
Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Jul; 123(13):1774-9. PubMed ID: 20819645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transulnar compared with transradial artery approach as a default strategy for coronary procedures: a randomized trial. The Transulnar or Transradial Instead of Coronary Transfemoral Angiographies Study (the AURA of ARTEMIS Study).
Hahalis G; Tsigkas G; Xanthopoulou I; Deftereos S; Ziakas A; Raisakis K; Pappas C; Sourgounis A; Grapsas N; Davlouros P; Galati A; Plakomyti TE; Mylona P; Styliadis I; Pyrgakis V; Alexopoulos D
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 23735472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of standard versus low dose heparin on access-related complications after coronary angiography through radial access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Sharma S; Yousuf A; Lee J; Azrin M; Jimenez E; Modi K; Tandon N
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018; 19(5 Pt B):575-579. PubMed ID: 29223499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fernandez R; Zaky F; Ekmejian A; Curtis E; Lee A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 29388387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ulnar Artery Interventions Non-Inferior to Radial Approach: AJmer Ulnar ARtery (AJULAR) Intervention Working Group Study Results.
Gokhroo R; Kishor K; Ranwa B; Bisht D; Gupta S; Padmanabhan D; Avinash A
J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 28(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26716587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiovascular Outcomes of Transulnar Versus Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Regression Matched Meta-Analysis.
Faisaluddin M; Sattar Y; Song D; Titus A; Erdem S; Alsaud A; Alharbi AA; Sulaiman S; Khan SU; Elgendy IY; Sengodan P; Dani SS; Alam M; Alraies MC; Daggubati R
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Aug; 201():92-100. PubMed ID: 37352671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of transradial coronary procedures via right radial versus left radial artery approach: A meta-analysis.
Shah RM; Patel D; Abbate A; Cowley MJ; Jovin IS
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Dec; 88(7):1027-1033. PubMed ID: 27037544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty - A prospective, randomized comparison.
Bhat FA; Changal KH; Raina H; Tramboo NA; Rather HA
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28077091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available.
Kedev S; Zafirovska B; Dharma S; Petkoska D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 83(1):E51-60. PubMed ID: 23832623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Ferrante G; Rao SV; Jüni P; Da Costa BR; Reimers B; Condorelli G; Anzuini A; Jolly SS; Bertrand OF; Krucoff MW; Windecker S; Valgimigli M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(14):1419-34. PubMed ID: 27372195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of ulnar artery for cardiac catheterization: AJmer ULnar ARtery (AJULAR) catheterization study.
Gokhroo R; Bisht D; Padmanabhan D; Gupta S; Kishor K; Ranwa B
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jul; 86(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 25559217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transulnar cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: techniques, transradial comparisons, anatomical considerations, and comprehensive literature review.
Kar S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 90(7):1126-1134. PubMed ID: 28766859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of radial versus femoral access site on coronary angiography and intervention outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Brener MI; Bush A; Miller JM; Hasan RK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 90(7):1093-1104. PubMed ID: 28544320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
