These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26332315)

  • 41. Driving performance of drivers with impaired central visual field acuity.
    Lamble D; Summala H; Hyvärinen L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2002 Sep; 34(5):711-6. PubMed ID: 12214966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of fixation pattern and reading ability in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy.
    Altpeter EK; Blanke BR; Leo-Kottler B; Nguyen XN; Trauzettel-Klosinski S
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 33(4):344-8. PubMed ID: 24256876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The driving visual field and a history of motor vehicle collision involvement in older drivers: a population-based examination.
    Huisingh C; McGwin G; Wood J; Owsley C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 56(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 25395488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The performance of iPad-based noise-field perimeter versus Humphrey Field Analyser in detecting glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Ding J; Tecson IC; Ang BCH; Chiew W; Chua C; Yip LWL
    Eye (Lond); 2022 Apr; 36(4):800-811. PubMed ID: 33879855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Young drivers' perception of adult and child pedestrians in potential street-crossing situations.
    Ābele L; Haustein S; Møller M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():263-268. PubMed ID: 29625692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of prism on preferred retinal locus.
    Lewerenz D; Blanco D; Ratzlaff C; Zodrow A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):260-266. PubMed ID: 28940374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: effect on low vision reading.
    Fletcher DC; Schuchard RA; Watson G
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1999 Oct; 36(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 10678458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effectiveness of Lateral Auditory Collision Warnings: Should Warnings Be Toward Danger or Toward Safety?
    Chen J; Šabić E; Mishler S; Parker C; Yamaguchi M
    Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 64(2):418-435. PubMed ID: 32779474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Novel 3D computer-automated threshold Amsler grid visual field testing of scotomas in patients with glaucoma.
    Nguyen DT; Fahimi A; Fink W; Nazemi PP; Kim JK; Sadun AA
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):776-82. PubMed ID: 19787597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Using two preferred retinal loci for different lighting conditions in patients with central scotomas.
    Lei H; Schuchard RA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Aug; 38(9):1812-8. PubMed ID: 9286270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Visual rehabilitation using microperimetric acoustic biofeedback training in individuals with central scotoma.
    Ratra D; Gopalakrishnan S; Dalan D; Ratra V; Damkondwar D; Laxmi G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):172-179. PubMed ID: 30253443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Impact of Oncoming Headlight Glare With Cataracts: A Pilot Study.
    Hwang AD; Tuccar-Burak M; Goldstein R; Peli E
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():164. PubMed ID: 29559933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effectiveness of augmented reality warnings on driving behaviour whilst approaching pedestrian crossings: A driving simulator study.
    Calvi A; D'Amico F; Ferrante C; Bianchini Ciampoli L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Nov; 147():105760. PubMed ID: 32932209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sprint car visual loss.
    Purvin V; Maturi R; Vaphiades MS
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2004; 49(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 14711442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. How does intersection field of view influence driving safety in an emergent situation?
    Yan X; Zhang X; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():162-175. PubMed ID: 30036817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Driving with binocular visual field loss? A study on a supervised on-road parcours with simultaneous eye and head tracking.
    Kasneci E; Sippel K; Aehling K; Heister M; Rosenstiel W; Schiefer U; Papageorgiou E
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87470. PubMed ID: 24523869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Impact of superior and inferior visual field loss on hazard detection in a computer-based driving test.
    Glen FC; Smith ND; Crabb DP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 99(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25425712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Young and older adult pedestrians' behavior when crossing a street in front of conventional and self-driving cars.
    Dommes A; Merlhiot G; Lobjois R; Dang NT; Vienne F; Boulo J; Oliver AH; Crétual A; Cavallo V
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106256. PubMed ID: 34146938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reading with simulated scotomas: attending to the right is better than attending to the left.
    Fine EM; Rubin GS
    Vision Res; 1999 Mar; 39(5):1039-48. PubMed ID: 10341954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Perimetry findings and driving performance. "How much visual field" does a motorist need?].
    Schiefer U; Hofer R; Vischer PM; Wilhelm H
    Ophthalmologe; 2000 Jul; 97(7):491-7. PubMed ID: 10959186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.