These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26332492)

  • 1. Public preferences for communicating personal genomic risk information: a focus group study.
    Smit AK; Keogh LA; Hersch J; Newson AJ; Butow P; Williams G; Cust AE
    Health Expect; 2016 Dec; 19(6):1203-1214. PubMed ID: 26332492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does personalized melanoma genomic risk information trigger conversations about skin cancer prevention and skin examination with family, friends and health professionals?
    Smit AK; Keogh LA; Newson AJ; Butow PN; Dunlop K; Morton RL; Kirk J; Espinoza D; Cust AE
    Br J Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 177(3):779-790. PubMed ID: 28627002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the Potential Emotional and Behavioural Impact of Providing Personalised Genomic Risk Information to the Public: A Focus Group Study.
    Smit AK; Keogh LA; Newson AJ; Hersch J; Butow P; Cust AE
    Public Health Genomics; 2015; 18(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 26390062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the emotional and behavioural reactions to receiving personalized melanoma genomic risk information: a qualitative study.
    Fenton GL; Smit AK; Keogh L; Cust AE
    Br J Dermatol; 2019 Jun; 180(6):1390-1396. PubMed ID: 30580464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of Giving Information on Personalized Genomic Risk of Melanoma to the Public.
    Smit AK; Espinoza D; Newson AJ; Morton RL; Fenton G; Freeman L; Dunlop K; Butow PN; Law MH; Kimlin MG; Keogh LA; Dobbinson SJ; Kirk J; Kanetsky PA; Mann GJ; Cust AE
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Feb; 26(2):212-221. PubMed ID: 27702805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Absolute risk representation in cardiovascular disease prevention: comprehension and preferences of health care consumers and general practitioners involved in a focus group study.
    Hill S; Spink J; Cadilhac D; Edwards A; Kaufman C; Rogers S; Ryan R; Tonkin A
    BMC Public Health; 2010 Mar; 10():108. PubMed ID: 20199692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and Evaluation of a Telephone Communication Protocol for the Delivery of Personalized Melanoma Genomic Risk to the General Population.
    Fenton GL; Smit AK; Freeman L; Badcock C; Dunlop K; Butow PN; Kirk J; Cust AE
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Apr; 27(2):370-380. PubMed ID: 29199389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation considerations for offering personal genomic risk information to the public: a qualitative study.
    Smit AK; Reyes-Marcelino G; Keogh L; Dunlop K; Newson AJ; Cust AE
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):1028. PubMed ID: 32600382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patients' preferences for biopsy result notification in an era of electronic messaging methods.
    Choudhry A; Hong J; Chong K; Jiang B; Hartman R; Chu E; Nelson K; Wei ML; Nguyen T
    JAMA Dermatol; 2015 May; 151(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 25831475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personal genomic screening: How best to facilitate preparedness of future clients.
    Fleming J; Terrill B; Dziadek M; Kirk EP; Roscioli T; Barlow-Stewart K
    Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 31085343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preferences for receiving information among frail older adults and their informal caregivers: a qualitative study.
    Robben S; van Kempen J; Heinen M; Zuidema S; Olde Rikkert M; Schers H; Melis R
    Fam Pract; 2012 Dec; 29(6):742-7. PubMed ID: 22532402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Delivery styles and formats for different stroke information topics: patient and carer preferences.
    Eames S; Hoffmann T; Worrall L; Read S
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Aug; 84(2):e18-23. PubMed ID: 20708899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suits you? A qualitative study exploring preferences regarding the tailoring of consumer medicines information.
    Dickinson R; Hamrosi K; Knapp P; Aslani P; Sowter J; Krass I; Raynor DK
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Aug; 21(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 23419082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What are cancer patients' experiences and preferences for the provision of written information in the palliative care setting? A focus group study.
    Tomlinson K; Barker S; Soden K
    Palliat Med; 2012 Jul; 26(5):760-5. PubMed ID: 21908521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding and preferences regarding risk communication during pregnancy: a survey to facilitate provider communication with patients.
    Ferguson M; Shapiro GD; McDonald SD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100929. PubMed ID: 36931434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceived susceptibility to and knowledge of malignant melanoma: screening participants vs the general population.
    Brandberg Y; Bolund C; Michelson H; Mansson-Brahme E; Ringborg U; Sjödén PO
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 8860282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tailoring risk communication to improve comprehension: Do patient preferences help or hurt?
    Barnes AJ; Hanoch Y; Miron-Shatz T; Ozanne EM
    Health Psychol; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1007-16. PubMed ID: 27183307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is email an effective method for hospital discharge communication? A randomized controlled trial to examine delivery of computer-generated discharge summaries by email, fax, post and patient hand delivery.
    Chen Y; Brennan N; Magrabi F
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Mar; 79(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 20097600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From hypothetical scenario to tragic reality: A salutary lesson in risk communication and the Victorian 2009 bushfires.
    Burns R; Robinson P; Smith P
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2010 Feb; 34(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 20920101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.