283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26333555)
1. High frequency ultrasonography: a complementary diagnostic method in evaluation of primary cutaneous melanoma.
Maj M; Warszawik-Hendzel O; Szymanska E; Walecka I; Rakowska A; Antczak-Marczak M; Kuna P; Kruszewski J; Nasierowska-Guttmejer A; Litniewski J; Nowicki A; Olszewska M; Rudnicka L
G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Oct; 150(5):595-601. PubMed ID: 26333555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Value of High-frequency 20 MHz Ultrasonography for Preoperative Measurement of Cutaneous Melanoma Thickness.
Kozárová A; Kozár M; Tonhajzerová I; Pappová T; Minariková E
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2018 Apr; 26(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 29782294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Melanoma histological Breslow thickness predicted by 75-MHz ultrasonography.
Guitera P; Li LX; Crotty K; Fitzgerald P; Mellenbergh R; Pellacani G; Menzies SW
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 159(2):364-9. PubMed ID: 18565186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of equivocal melanocytic lesions detected by digital dermoscopy follow-up.
Lovatto L; Carrera C; Salerni G; Alós L; Malvehy J; Puig S
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1918-25. PubMed ID: 25752663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reflectance confocal microscopy features of thin versus thick melanomas.
Kardynal A; Olszewska M; de Carvalho N; Walecka I; Pellacani G; Rudnicka L
G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2019 Aug; 154(4):379-385. PubMed ID: 29368860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reflectance confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of partially and completely amelanotic melanoma: report on seven cases.
Maier T; Sattler EC; Braun-Falco M; Korting HC; Ruzicka T; Berking C
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):e42-52. PubMed ID: 22324783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma.
Fink C; Haenssle HA
Skin Res Technol; 2017 Aug; 23(3):261-271. PubMed ID: 27878858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Preliminary Study for Quantitative Assessment with HFUS (High- Frequency Ultrasound) of Nodular Skin Melanoma Breslow Thickness in Adults Before Surgery: Interdisciplinary Team Experience.
Reginelli A; Belfiore MP; Russo A; Turriziani F; Moscarella E; Troiani T; Brancaccio G; Ronchi A; Giunta E; Sica A; Iovino F; Ciardiello F; Franco R; Argenziano G; Grassi R; Cappabianca S
Curr Radiopharm; 2020; 13(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 31589132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dermoscopic difficult lesions: an objective evaluation of reflectance confocal microscopy impact for accurate diagnosis.
Ferrari B; Pupelli G; Farnetani F; De Carvalho NT; Longo C; Reggiani C; Argenziano G; Pellacani G
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Jun; 29(6):1135-40. PubMed ID: 25303304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-resolution ultrasonography assists the differential diagnosis of blue naevi and cutaneous metastases of melanoma.
Samimi M; Perrinaud A; Naouri M; Maruani A; Perrodeau E; Vaillant L; Machet L
Br J Dermatol; 2010 Sep; 163(3):550-6. PubMed ID: 20545694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative 15-MHz ultrasound assessment of tumor thickness in malignant melanoma.
Fernández Canedo I; de Troya Martín M; Fúnez Liébana R; Rivas Ruiz F; Blanco Eguren G; Blázquez Sánchez N
Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2013 Apr; 104(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 22938997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is ultrasound lymph node examination superior to clinical examination in melanoma follow-up? A monocentre cohort study of 373 patients.
Machet L; Nemeth-Normand F; Giraudeau B; Perrinaud A; Tiguemounine J; Ayoub J; Alison D; Vaillant L; Lorette G
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Jan; 152(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 15656802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dermoscopy structures as predictors of sentinel lymph node positivity in cutaneous melanoma.
González-Álvarez T; Carrera C; Bennassar A; Vilalta A; Rull R; Alos L; Palou J; Vidal-Sicart S; Malvehy J; Puig S
Br J Dermatol; 2015; 172(5):1269-77. PubMed ID: 25418318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinct melanoma types based on reflectance confocal microscopy.
Pellacani G; De Pace B; Reggiani C; Cesinaro AM; Argenziano G; Zalaudek I; Soyer HP; Longo C
Exp Dermatol; 2014 Jun; 23(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 24750486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The diagnostic accuracy of in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy compared to dermoscopy of benign and malignant melanocytic lesions: a prospective study.
Langley RG; Walsh N; Sutherland AE; Propperova I; Delaney L; Morris SF; Gallant C
Dermatology; 2007; 215(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 17912001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current technologies for the in vivo diagnosis of cutaneous melanomas.
Wang SQ; Rabinovitz H; Kopf AW; Oliviero M
Clin Dermatol; 2004; 22(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15262307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integration of reflectance confocal microscopy in sequential dermoscopy follow-up improves melanoma detection accuracy.
Stanganelli I; Longo C; Mazzoni L; Magi S; Medri M; Lanzanova G; Farnetani F; Pellacani G
Br J Dermatol; 2015 Feb; 172(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 25154446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of melanoma thickness--comparison of two methods: ultrasound versus morphology.
Kaikaris V; Samsanavičius D; Kęstutis Maslauskas ; Rimdeika R; Valiukevičienė S; Makštienė J; Pundzius J
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Jun; 64(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 21123126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Preoperative ultrasonographic measurement of melanoma thickness with 20 MHz probe].
Pennasilico G; Santini A; Bono R; Cacciaguerra MG; Puddu P; Falappa P
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):388-91. PubMed ID: 7997609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. False-Negative Cases on Confocal Microscopy Examination: A Retrospective Evaluation and Critical Reappraisal.
Coco V; Farnetani F; Cesinaro AM; Ciardo S; Argenziano G; Peris K; Pellacani G; Longo C
Dermatology; 2016; 232(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 26862920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
